A direct revelation mechanism asks agents to report their types directly, then computes allocation and payments from those reports. Being direct does not itself imply strategyproofness; the allocation and payment rules must supply the incentive guarantee.
An equilibrium outcome of a mechanism can be reproduced by asking for types and then sending the messages prescribed by the original equilibrium strategies. Truthful reports are then a Bayesian Nash equilibrium: a profitable false report would induce a profitable original deviation. This reduces optimization over indirect mechanisms to direct revelation mechanisms with Bayesian incentive compatibility, under the same information and participation assumptions.
The pivot form chooses a reported-welfare-maximizing allocation and charges each agent the maximum welfare achievable by the others without that agent minus the others' welfare in the chosen allocation. With quasilinear utility, truthful reporting is a dominant strategy because the first term in the payment depends only on other reports. For two identical items and three unit-demand bidders, each winner pays the lowest reported valuation and the loser pays zero.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.