Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 25 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Write and use for distance to the nearest integer. The Dirichlet approximation theorem, in its pigeonhole form, says that for every real and integer there are coprime integers with and . Indeed put the fractional parts of into equal intervals; two lie in the same interval. Their difference gives , and reducing the fraction preserves the claimed bound. This includes rational .
For , the finite geometric series has length . When ,The last inequality uses the concavity of sine on . The triangle inequality also gives . At integer the sum has absolute value , interpreting the reciprocal as infinity. Thus the precise exponential geometric sum bound isThe interval must be nonempty; for its sum is zero and its length should be defined as , rather than using a potentially negative bound.
For the separated points, assume and . An arc of length contains at most of the points, by ordering them along the arc. Points with contribute . In the dyadic annulus , each summand is and there are at most points. There are nonempty annuli, giving the stronger separated reciprocal-distance sumIf there is only one point the bound is immediate; otherwise . The printed requires a lower bound away from ; avoids that endpoint defect.
A useful version of the quadratic Weyl inequality is the following, with , and :For , expand the square of this quadratic exponential sum by :The exponential geometric sum bound therefore gives . For , partition these into blocks of length at most . Two different points in one block have difference with . The reduced denominator of is at least , so , whileThus the rotations are separated by at least in each block. The separated reciprocal-distance sum bounds each block by . There are blocks, and henceFor or , the trivial bound supplies the same assertion with an absolute constant. The same proof applies to , whose difference sums also have interval endpoints.
We finally prove a polynomial rate of quantitative quadratic recurrence, without using the optional finite-group assumption. For , use the periodic triangular bump . It is times the periodic convolution of two interval indicators, and therefore has the nonnegative Fourier coefficientsIts Fourier series is absolutely convergent, , and the coefficient tail is . Suppose that for every . Then . Choose with a sufficiently large absolute , so that the contribution of frequencies has absolute value at most . The zero frequency contributes . Since all coefficients are nonnegative and their sum is one, some must satisfyApply the Dirichlet approximation theorem to with , obtaining a reduced , . The quadratic Weyl inequality then impliesSet . For sufficiently large , the term is absorbed on the left, giving . The integer consequently satisfiesMoreover the approximating integer is , andThis contradicts the assumed avoidance. Increasing the absolute constant handles the finitely many smaller , uniformly for every real . Thus
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 79 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
There is a minor range issue in the printed bound: for and positive , the upper bound is below one. We prove the intended result for ; a valid formulation for every replaces the upper bound by . In fact the argument below gives . All auxiliary estimates are proved here.
For , let , and use the Fejér kernelExpanding the square proves the identity and nonnegativity. The finite geometric series formula and give off the integers. In particular whenever .
Suppose, for a contradiction, that no has . Summing the Fejér kernel along the quadratic sequence and separating its constant term givesThe coefficients on the right sum to . Also . Hence some has , where .
We need only an elementary Van der Corput inequality for finite scalar sequences. For , extended by zero outside , each term of occurs in exactly windows of length . Applying the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality to the window sums and expanding their squares gives, for ,Consequently . Take . If , some must have ; otherwise the displayed upper bound is less than .
For the large quadratic exponential sum just found, put . Its quadratic exponential sum has multiplicative derivativeThus is a finite geometric series. Its absolute value is at most , unless that distance is zero, in which case the desired estimate is automatic. It follows thatSet . The distance to the nearest integer satisfies for a positive integer , by multiplying a nearest integer to . ThereforeThis proves the needed quantitative quadratic recurrence once is chosen polynomially in .
For explicit bookkeeping, and . Choose . For we have and , while . Hence and , contradicting our supposition. The estimates have substantial slack even at .
Quantitative quadratic recurrence 2026-10-07
For a universal constant and , every real admits with distance to the nearest integer of less than . A Fejér kernel detects failure of recurrence as a large quadratic exponential sum. The Van der Corput inequality for finite scalar sequences then produces a short linear near-return, whose suitable multiple gives the quadratic return. To include , use the bound .