The positive steady state satisfies , so
With , the linearization is
Its characteristic polynomial is , where . The roots are inside the unit disk precisely when : when they are real they are positive with sum one, and when complex conjugate their common modulus is . Therefore the fixed point is linearly asymptotically stable for and unstable for . At ,
This proves period six for the neutral linearized oscillations. The stronger printed claim of a nonlinear period-six branch is not valid for the stated recurrence. It is important to distinguish these two assertions.
Here is a local obstruction, which also checks that the qualification is not merely absence of a proof. Normalize by the moving fixed point, let , , and define
Put , , and for . The quadratic and cubic terms of 's second component are . Composing six times gives
In particular the quadratic terms cancel, while the cubic components are and . If a small nonzero were a period-six point, invertibility of and the norm of this equation would imply . Taking its determinant with then gives
Since , this is impossible for sufficiently small nonzero . Thus no nontrivial nonlinear six-cycle bifurcates locally at . At the threshold the same expansion gives , so the fixed point is actually locally asymptotically stable nonlinearly, with slow decay. The valid intended linear-stability conclusion is the period-six neutral oscillation above; a literal nonlinear assertion requires a changed model or wording. This is an example of the distinction between linear resonance and nonlinear periodic bifurcation.