The positive steady state satisfies , so
With , the linearization is
Its characteristic polynomial is , where . The roots are inside the unit disk precisely when : when they are real they are positive with sum one, and when complex conjugate their common modulus is . Therefore the fixed point is linearly asymptotically stable for and unstable for . At ,
This proves period six for the neutral linearized oscillations. The stronger printed claim of a nonlinear period-six branch is not valid for the stated recurrence. It is important to distinguish these two assertions.
Here is a local obstruction, which also checks that the qualification is not merely absence of a proof. Normalize by the moving fixed point, let , , and define
Put , , and for . The quadratic and cubic terms of 's second component are . Composing six times gives
In particular the quadratic terms cancel, while the cubic components are and . If a small nonzero were a period-six point, invertibility of and the norm of this equation would imply . Taking its determinant with then gives
Since , this is impossible for sufficiently small nonzero . Thus no nontrivial nonlinear six-cycle bifurcates locally at . At the threshold the same expansion gives , so the fixed point is actually locally asymptotically stable nonlinearly, with slow decay. The valid intended linear-stability conclusion is the period-six neutral oscillation above; a literal nonlinear assertion requires a changed model or wording. This is an example of the distinction between linear resonance and nonlinear periodic bifurcation.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.