Electron pairing energy 2026-10-20
The electron pairing energy represents the energetic penalty for putting electrons into already occupied orbitals rather than suitable separate orbitals. A simple comparison with octahedral splitting explains high-spin and low-spin alternatives.
Past exam of the chemistry A course of the University of Cambridge 2023 Paper 1 A4 a v Solution 2026-10-20
For unpaired electrons, the spin-only magnetic moment iswhere is the Bohr magneton and the second expression uses .
For the square, a large separation of the highest level favours pairing in the lower four molecular orbitals: , , . If the cost of occupying were smaller than the relevant electron pairing energy, a high-spin complex with two unpaired electrons and could instead occur, giving .
For ideal tetrahedral , the occupation is . Hund's rules distribute four electrons over the three degenerate molecular orbitals as one pair and two single occupations. Thus and . Merely increasing the – splitting does not create a conventional paired tetrahedral alternative: four electrons must still occupy .
Past exam of the chemistry B course of the University of Cambridge 2024 Paper 2 B8 a ii Solution 2026-10-20
iron remains Fe(II), , in both states; the change is a spin crossover, rather than a change in oxidation state. At the higher temperature the high-spin complex has : four unpaired electrons, , andThis matches the observed moment. At low temperature a low-spin complex with has and shows diamagnetism. Cooling switches high-spin to low-spin . Emptying the metal–ligand antibonding orbitals strengthens and shortens the Fe–N bonds, accounting for the contraction by roughly .
The octahedral splitting and electron pairing energy must be sufficiently close for both states to be accessible. The low-spin state gains electronic energy, while the high-spin state has greater spin degeneracy and usually greater vibrational entropy because of its softer bonds. The resulting Gibbs free energy balance favors high spin at higher temperature. The two endpoint observations do not by themselves specify hysteresis or transition cooperativity; those require a temperature series. Coupled structural and magnetic measurements distinguish this explanation from a mere bond-length anomaly.