Suppose is a normalised set function and a submodular set function, and cover every element of exactly times, counting repetitions in the indexed collection. Then the displayed inequality holds. Neither the monotone set function property nor the nonnegative function property is required.
Proof. Fix an ordering of and write for its successive marginal increments. The chain lower bound for a submodular set function gives . Summing counts each exactly times, and . Exact coverage matters because the may be negative. For a monotone set function, the same argument also allows each element to occur at least times.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.