Almost-additive partition-function limit 2026-10-14
The sequences and are respectively subadditive and superadditive. Apply Fekete's lemma to the first and its negative to the second; their normalized difference is , so their limits coincide. For full-shift weighted orbit sums, summable variations of the potential bound the energy change at a concatenation boundary, giving this estimate for the logarithm of the partition function. A fixed initial symbol or fixed remote tail changes only a bounded normalization and not the limit.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2001 iii Paper 55 4 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use the geometric properties of the Feigenbaum geometric potential: for some constants ,Here means variation between sequences agreeing in their first symbols. In particular . These are the standard bounds for the Feigenbaum geometric potential; the symbolic potential is not the singular expression at a quadratic critical point.
First allow all spins and use a fixed remote tail , writing for the weighted partition function. In a concatenated block of lengths and , replacing the history before the second block by changes its energy by at most : the th summand has the same first symbols, so its difference is at most . ThereforeFor , the almost-additive partition-function limit follows explicitly: is subadditive and superadditive, so Fekete's lemma gives the same finite limit for both after division by . The finiteness follows from bounded and the words.
Changing the fixed remote tail also changes each full energy by at most . The question fixes the first spin to one and sums the remaining spins; its partition function is . The tail comparison and bounded first contribution show that its normalized logarithm has the same limit. Thus the requested exists and equals the topological pressure of .
For any , every length- energy lies between and , henceTaking normalized logarithms and limits givesSo is Lipschitz continuous and strictly decreasing. For each finite , differentiation of the log-sum gives . Thus is convex, and passing to its finite pointwise limit proves that is convex too.