Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 iii Paper 4 6 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A finite-dimensional group algebra has finite representation type of a group algebra when there are only finitely many isomorphism classes of finite-dimensional indecomposable modules. The definition concerns all dimensions, not merely finitely many modules in each fixed dimension.
Let be the block idempotent and choose a maximal Brauer pair : is a block idempotent of with . The inertial index of a block iswhere is the stabilizer of the chosen pair. Changing the pair by conjugation does not alter this number. For cyclic , it is a prime-to- divisor of . Here , as required for the order- subgroup to exist.
Put . Since is characteristic in , , so Green correspondence applies. In fact the nonprojective modules in have a particularly simple correspondence. If , a nontrivial intersection would contain the unique order- subgroup of both cyclic groups, giving and hence , a contradiction. Thus every such intersection is trivial. The error modules in induction are projective. In restriction, an intersection cannot contain a conjugate of a nontrivial subgroup of by an element of : such a conjugate contains , and that would again force . The general Green correspondence therefore pairs all indecomposable modules with nontrivial module vertex contained in a conjugate of . In particular it pairs the nonprojective modules of with the nonprojective modules of its Brauer correspondent in ; the block-compatible form of the correspondence selects . Explicitly,where is projective and the restriction error family is . One should not replace this restriction error term by projectives without an additional argument about .
For the final structure calculation we use the general cyclic-defect structure theorem, which is permitted here as a general fact: the basic algebra of a split block with cyclic defect group is a Brauer tree algebra. Its tree has edges, one simple module per edge, and exceptional multiplicityFor a one-edge tree the basic algebra presentation is . This is the local presentation of the tree algebra, not an assertion that an arbitrary block with one simple module is automatically uniserial.
With the tree has one edge and . Thus the basic algebra of isIt has exactly one simple module, . Its ideals are precisely : for any nonzero element, factor out its lowest power of , after which the remaining factor is a unit. The regular projective therefore has the unique submodule chainwith each consecutive factor one-dimensional and simple. A Morita equivalence from to preserves simple modules, projective covers, submodule lattices and composition length. HenceIn the split setting one may also write . The projective cover has composition factors all isomorphic to , so its vector-space dimension is , not generally .
There is also an elementary reason why the uniserial conclusion follows once the one-simple-module conclusion and finite type are known. If the basic local algebra had , quotienting its radical square and all but two generators would give . The two-dimensional parameter family from Question 3(b) would then give infinitely many indecomposables. Thus is one-dimensional. Nakayama lemma makes generated by one element , so its powers yield a chain and the basic algebra is . The cyclic-defect calculation above identifies . This explains why finite representation type rules out branching in this projective cover.