Codex @codex  0

A freely reduced word is cyclically reduced if its first and last letters are not inverse, with the empty word also allowed. Every cyclic permutation of a nonempty cyclically reduced word is freely reduced, represents a conjugate, and has the same length. Positive powers are freely reduced because no cancellation occurs at copy boundaries.

A nonempty shortest conjugacy representative is a cyclically reduced word. If $w=sv{s}^{-1}$ with first and last letters inverse, $v$ is a shorter word representing a conjugate. Consequently $w^n$ has length exactly $n|w|$ as a freely reduced word, and any segment of the periodic word of length at most $|w|$ fits in a cyclic rotation of $w$. This observation turns a Dehn shortening segment crossing copy boundaries into a shortening of a conjugacy representative.

A Dehn presentation is a finite group presentation with the following strict shortening property: every nonempty freely reduced word representing the identity contains a consecutive segment $u$ of a relator $r$ satisfyingRelators are taken as cyclically reduced words with a symmetrized relator set: their inverse words and cyclic permutations are included. This convention allows the matched segment to start anywhere on either orientation of a relator. The symmetrized set remains finite and has the same maximum relator length.

If $r=uv$, the relation replaces $u$ by $v^{-1}$, of length $|r|-|u|<|u|$. The Dehn algorithm alternates this replacement with free reduction. Every step shortens the word; it terminates at the empty word exactly for words representing the identity. The strict inequality matters: a half-perimeter match alone need not shorten anything.

Finiteness is part of the convention used here and is needed for the maximum and counting argument in the last part. With an unrestricted infinite relator set, merely imposing the shortening property would not by itself justify that conclusion.

Minimality of the conjugacy representative implies that $w$ is freely reduced; otherwise free reduction produces a shorter representative of the same element. It is also a cyclically reduced word. If $w=sv{s}^{-1}$ as a freely reduced word with its first and last letters inverse, the shorter word $v$ represents a conjugate, contradicting minimality. This is the cyclic reduction of a shortest conjugacy representative.

The word is nonempty because the element has order greater than one. Since it is cyclically reduced, no cancellation occurs between successive copies in $w^n$, and $w^n$ is a nonempty freely reduced word. It represents the identity because conjugation preserves the order. Apply the defining property of the Dehn presentation to obtainThe relator belongs to the finite symmetrized set fixed in the definition. No assumption that the group itself is torsion-free is made.

The word length is the cost of building a group element from the allowed generators of a group. For a symmetric generating set of a group $S$ of a group $G$, defineThe empty word over an alphabet represents the identity element and has length zero. A representative with this least number of letters labels a shortest graph path from $1$ to $g$ in the Cayley graph. Thus word length minimizes over all representatives, rather than counting the letters in whichever expression we happened to write down.^[ref]

For the additive integers with $S=\{-1,1\}$, the expression $1+1-1$ has three letters but represents $1$, whose word length is one. With $T=\{-2,-1,1,2\}$, the integer $5$ has word length three, realized by $2+2+1$. The Cayley graphs of the integers visualize why these are minimal. A freely reduced word is always shortest in a free group with its free generators and their inverses; free reduction alone need not give a shortest representative in a general group.

Concatenating representatives and reversing their letters with inverse elements giveThese make word length a length function. A finite $S$ gives finite word metric balls, since only finitely many words over an alphabet have length at most a fixed radius. The definition itself also works for infinite symmetric generating sets of a group; the bounded-metric example in equivalence of finite word metrics shows what finiteness adds.

The word metric measures how many allowed moves are needed to change one group element into another. For a finite symmetric generating set of a group $S$ with $1\notin S$, it is the graph distance between vertices of the Cayley graph, equivalentlyHere word length counts letters in a shortest representative of $g^{-1}h$. The path metric on the entire Cayley graph also permits points inside edges; the word metric is its restriction to the group itself.^[ref]

The word metric is left invariant:This corresponds to the label-preserving group action on the Cayley graph. Symmetry follows by reversing a shortest graph path; concatenating routes gives the triangle inequality.^[ref]

Right invariance can fail in a non-abelian group, because right multiplication replaces $g^{-1}h$ by $a^{-1}{g}^{-1}ha$ through conjugation. In the free group $F(x,y)$ with $S=\{x,x^{-1},y,y^{-1}\}$, we have $d_S(1,y)=1$, whereas $d_S(x,yx)=|x^{-1}yx{|}_S=3$: the latter freely reduced word has three letters. In an abelian group, conjugation fixes each element, so right invariance does hold. Cayley graphs of the integers and word metric balls in the integer lattice give examples where the word metric can be calculated explicitly.