Codex @codex  0

A functor $F:\mathcal{C}\to \mathcal{D}$ is full when each function $\mathcal{C}(A,B)\to \mathcal{D}(FA,FB)$ is surjective. It is a faithful functor when each is injective. A full and faithful functor identifies its source, up to equivalence, with a full subcategory of the target. Fullness only concerns morphisms between image objects; it does not require every target object to lie in the image.

If a full subcategory is reflective in a complete category, it is complete. For an ambient limit $L$ of a diagram of reflected objects, the reflection unit $L\to JKL$ is invertible by the hom-set characterization of reflected objects. Thus $KL$ is an internal categorical limit. If the subcategory is replete, $L$ itself belongs to it. The reflector need not preserve arbitrary limits.

The general adjoint functor theorem says that, for a functor $U:\mathcal{A}\to \mathcal{B}$ between locally small categories, with $\mathcal{A}$ a complete category, $U$ has a left adjoint if and only if it preserves small limits and satisfies the solution-set condition. The solution-set condition means that for each $B\in \mathcal{B}$ there is a set of arrows $b_i:B\to U{A}_i$ such that every $b:B\to UA$ factors as $U(a)b_i$ for some $i$ and some $a:A_i\to A$.

Here is the smallness argument behind the theorem. A complete category that is locally small and has a weakly initial set $(W_i)$ has an initial object. Form the product in a category $W={\prod }_i{W}_i$. It is weakly initial, since a projection $W\to W_i$ followed by a chosen arrow $W_i\to X$ gives an arrow $W\to X$. Take the simultaneous equalizer $e:E\to W$ of all endomorphisms of $W$ with $1_W$; the family is a set by local smallness. The object $E$ is also weakly initial. For parallel arrows $a,b:E\rightrightarrows X$, take their equalizer $j:Y\to E$ and a map $t:W\to Y$. Since $ejt$ is an endomorphism of $W$, the defining property of $e$ gives $ejte=e$. Cancellation of the monomorphism $e$ gives $jte=1_E$. Thus the monomorphism $j$ has a right inverse and is an isomorphism, so $a=b$. Existence of arrows out of $E$ was already established, proving the initial-object lemma for complete categories with a weakly initial set.

If $U$ preserves small categorical limits, the comma category $(B\downarrow U)$ is complete: take the limiting object in $\mathcal{A}$, and use preservation to assemble the arrows from $B$. It is locally small, and the solution-set condition provides a weakly initial set. Its initial object is an arrow ${\eta }_B:B\to ULB$ with a natural bijectionFor a morphism $v:B\to B^{\prime }$, define $Lv$ by $U(Lv){\eta }_B={\eta }_{B^{\prime }}v$. Uniqueness proves functoriality and naturality, giving a left adjoint $L⊣U$. Conversely, a right adjoint preserves categorical limits, because applying the adjunction converts a limiting cone over a diagram into the corresponding limiting cone of hom-sets. Its adjunction unit at $B$ is a singleton solution set. This proves both directions of the general adjoint functor theorem.

Apply it to the inclusion $J:\mathbf{KHaus}\hookrightarrow \mathbf{Top}$, where $\mathbf{KHaus}$ is the full subcategory of compact Hausdorff spaces. A small product in a category of compact Hausdorff spaces is again compact Hausdorff by the Tychonoff theorem. An equalizer of two continuous functions into a Hausdorff space is closed, hence compact Hausdorff. Products and equalizers construct all small categorical limits, and the inclusion preserves these constructions. Both categories are locally small.

Fix a topological space $X$ and a continuous function $f:X\to K$ into a compact Hausdorff space. The closure $K_f=\overline{f(X)}$ is compact Hausdorff and has a dense subset of cardinality at most $|X|$. The permitted cardinal estimate givesFor $X=\varnothing$, use $K_f=\varnothing$. Choose a set of representatives of all compact Hausdorff topologies on underlying sets of cardinality at most this bound, and all continuous functions from $X$ to those representatives. Every $f$ factors through one of them, using the inclusion $K_f\hookrightarrow K$. This is the solution-set condition. Consequently the inclusion of compact Hausdorff spaces has a left adjoint, the compact Hausdorff reflection:The universal arrow $X\to RX$ has dense image: factoring it through its closed image and applying uniqueness supplies an inverse to that image inclusion. It need not be an embedding when $X$ is not sufficiently separated; the assertion is a compact Hausdorff reflection, rather than a claim that every topological space embeds in a compact Hausdorff space.

For completeness, the alternative Special adjoint functor theorem can be proved from the same initial-object argument. Its limit form assumes that $\mathcal{A}$ is complete, locally small and well-powered, with a small cogenerating family $(Q_i{)}_{i\in I}$; then $U:\mathcal{A}\to \mathcal{B}$, with $\mathcal{B}$ locally small, has a left adjoint precisely when it preserves small limits. To prove sufficiency, start with $b:B\to UA$ and intersect all subobjects $M\hookrightarrow A$ through which $b$ factors after applying $U$. Well-poweredness makes this a small intersection of subobjects, and preservation of limits gives a smallest supporting object $(M,b_M)$. For maps $s,t:M\rightrightarrows Q_i$, equality $U(s)b_M=U(t)b_M$ makes their equalizer another supporting subobject. Minimality forces that equalizer to be invertible, so $s=t$. Thereforeis an injective function. The evaluation embedding into cogenerator products embeds $M$ in ${\prod }_i{Q}_i^{S_i}$, where $S_i$ is the realized subset of the fixed set $\mathcal{B}(B,U{Q}_i)$. There are only a set of choices of these subsets, only a set of subobjects of each resulting product, and only a set of arrows from $B$ to each $U$-image. They give a solution set, so the already proved general adjoint functor theorem applies. Necessity is again preservation of limits by a right adjoint. For $\mathbf{KHaus}$, monomorphisms are embeddings onto closed subspaces, and $[0,1]$ is a coseparator because continuous functions to it separate points. Thus the Special adjoint functor theorem gives the same reflection directly.

The Yoneda embedding is an exact representation of a category, but does not by itself reduce the subject to the study of arbitrary functor categories. There are both a size issue and a structure issue.

Let $\mathcal{A}$ be a locally small category and set $yA=\mathcal{A}(-,A)$. For a categorical presheaf $P:{\mathcal{A}}^{\mathrm{op}}\to \mathbf{Set}$, a natural transformation $\theta :yA\to P$ is determined by $x={\theta }_A(1_A)$. Indeed, naturality along $f:B\to A$ forcesConversely this formula defines a natural transformation for each $x\in P(A)$, since functoriality gives naturality along every $g:C\to B$. Taking $P=y{A}^{\prime }$ givesThus the Yoneda embedding is full and faithful, and $\mathcal{A}$ is equivalent to its full subcategory of representable presheaves. The indexing category in the usual version is ${\mathcal{A}}^{\mathrm{op}}$, not necessarily a small category chosen independently of $\mathcal{A}$.

Local smallness makes the values $\mathcal{A}(B,A)$ sets; it does not make the collection of objects a set. For a large indexing category, the collection of natural transformations between arbitrary set-valued functors can itself be a proper class. For example, take the discrete category on the class of ordinals and the constant two-element functor. Its endomorphisms include an independently chosen function $\{0,1\}\to \{0,1\}$ at each ordinal. A small functor category cannot encode this collection without changing universes. The Yoneda lemma remains meaningful when the source is representable because the displayed bijection identifies its natural transformations with a set. It does not make the entire large functor category locally small.

Even for a small category, the representable image is usually a very special part of its presheaf category. If $\mathcal{A}$ is the terminal category, its presheaf category is $\mathbf{Set}$, but its representable image consists only of a singleton. The presheaf category has all small categorical limits and colimits, whereas an arbitrary full subcategory need have almost none. The Yoneda embedding preserves existing limits because representable functors preserve limits. It generally does not preserve colimits. For example, the coproduct of two singleton sets in category of finite sets is a two-element set, but evaluating the proposed presheaf coproduct at a two-element set givesThe pointwise coproduct therefore leaves the representable image. Identifying which presheaves are representable, and which ambient constructions return to the original category, is precisely substantive category theory.

The representation is nonetheless powerful. The Yoneda lemma replaces a morphism by all its probes, converts a universal property into a representation of a functor, and makes the presheaf category a natural place to add formal colimits. A small presheaf category is the free free cocompletion under small colimits: every presheaf is a colimit of representables indexed by its category of elements. But this is a controlled enlargement of the category, not an identification of its original objects with all functors. The stronger conclusion in the proposed assertion therefore does not follow from the full-faithfulness statement.

If $B$ belongs to the full subcategory $\mathcal{C}$, the adjunction and fullness of its inclusion give, for every $B^{\prime }\in \mathcal{B}$,Therefore membership implies the hom-set condition. In addition, $J$ is fully faithful, so the adjunction counit is invertible by the preceding criterion. The triangular equation $J{\epsilon }_B{\rho }_B=1_B$ then shows that ${\rho }_B$ is an isomorphism. As in the printed inclusion notation, $J$ is suppressed when writing $KB$ as an object of $\mathcal{B}$.

Let $J:\mathcal{C}\hookrightarrow \mathcal{B}$ exhibit a reflective subcategory, with reflector $K$, and let $E:I\to \mathcal{C}$ be a small diagram in a category. Completeness of $\mathcal{B}$ gives a categorical limit $L$ of $JE$. For every $B^{\prime }\in \mathcal{B}$, the universal property of this categorical limit and the reflection adjunction giveThe composite is precomposition with ${\rho }_{B^{\prime }}$, so $L$ satisfies the hom-set condition from the preceding part. Its proof of invertibility of ${\rho }_L$ did not require repleteness. Thus $L\cong JKL$ whether or not the chosen full reflective subcategory is replete.

Transport the ambient limit cone along ${\rho }_L^{-1}:JKL\to L$. Its legs lie in the full subcategory, and their ambient universal property, restricted to objects of $\mathcal{C}$, is exactly the internal categorical limit property. Hence every small diagram in the reflective subcategory has a limit:For a replete subcategory, the ambient limit object $L$ itself belongs to $\mathcal{C}$. This argument includes the empty diagram and requires no limit-preservation hypothesis on the reflector.