Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 51 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let be the infinitesimal orbit tangent vectors. Since , Taylor expansion givesThis explains the stated linearization. For a linear group representation, in the corresponding action convention.
Two assumptions are implicit in the advertised integration formula. The slice must be regular, and the determinant sign must be fixed if the absolute value is omitted. Uniqueness alone does not imply regularity: translations on the line with have a unique gauge-fixed representative but . For ordinary real integration the Dirac delta distribution change-of-variables formula uses . The choice instead has a unique regular zero and negative determinant, illustrating why its sign cannot simply be dropped.
Assume a regular gauge slice with one representative on each orbit, and choose the action convention , matching the specified right-invariance of Haar measure. For the unique with , put . The Haar density is one at the identity, so changing from to near the unique zero givesThe integral is orbit invariant by the right-invariance of Haar measure. Thus is also orbit invariant, and on the gauge slice it equals . Insert into the original integral and use its invariant volume measure and invariant :In the second line set . This proves the finite-dimensional Faddeev-Popov gauge reductionChoose a positive orientation of the regular slice to obtain the question's form. If the group volume is infinite, its cancellation in normalized quantities is formal or regulated. Multiple intersections and residual zero modes invalidate the simple identity; in a gauge theory these are the Gribov ambiguity and residual gauge transformations.
The Yang-Mills action counts every gauge orbit redundantly in its path integral, and its quadratic gauge-field operator has gauge zero modes. A gauge fixing condition removes this redundancy, while the Faddeev-Popov determinant supplies the orbit-to-slice Jacobian. This is a local perturbative construction with the same regularity qualifications as the finite-dimensional derivation.
Take the linear condition . Under an infinitesimal gauge transformation , its change is . Hence the Faddeev-Popov operator is . For Lorenz gauge, . The gauge covariant derivative acts in the Adjoint representation.
Average the sharp constraint over with Gaussian weight . This replaces it by . The Gaussian gauge fixing with an auxiliary field identity rewrites that factor asby completing the square. The bosonic Nakanishi-Lautrup field is nondynamical: its algebraic field equation is . At it is a Lagrange multiplier enforcing .
The Grassmann Gaussian integral exponentiates the determinant, up to a field-independent phase, asThe independent anticommuting Faddeev-Popov ghost field and Faddeev-Popov antighost field are spacetime scalars in the Adjoint representation. They represent the Jacobian and do not describe physical external fermions. Combining these factors givesThe parameter selects the Gaussian averaging of the gauge condition. In an anomaly-free regulated treatment, physical gauge-invariant observables are independent of this choice. One way to express this is BRST symmetry: with , and , the gauge and ghost terms are . The ghost transformation supplies the off-shell nilpotence of the Yang-Mills BRST quartet, and gauge-fixing parameter independence from BRST symmetry explains why these auxiliary fields do not change the physical content.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 46 4 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Let be the separated gauge-invariant insertions. Their BRST symmetry variations vanish: the gauge field strength and its gauge covariant derivatives transform by adjoint commutators, and invariant color contractions remove these commutators. Thus .
Make the infinitesimal change of integration variables in the normalized expectation of . The action is invariant up to its boundary term and, by assumption, the measure has no Jacobian anomaly. ThereforeSince is generated by the BRST charge, this is the graded BRST Ward identityHere is the graded commutator. For even it is the ordinary commutator printed in the question; for odd it is an anticommutator. Separation of the other insertions from avoids the additional coincident-point contact terms. An operator need not itself be BRST-closed for this identity to hold.
A BRST-exact insertion has zero correlation with physical, gauge-invariant insertions. This is the decoupling of BRST-exact insertions in physical correlation functions. In the associated BRST cohomology, physical information is represented by closed states or operators modulo exact ones, schematically , using the nilpotence of the BRST charge in the anomaly-free theory. Gauge-fixing fields thereby do not supply additional physical observables.
For example, the gauge parameter dependence is exact:Differentiating a normalized physical correlation function with respect to inserts this expression; the BRST Ward identity makes that derivative zero under the same invariant-measure and boundary assumptions. This illustrates gauge-fixing parameter independence from BRST symmetry.