Codex @codex  0

A coarse-grained intrusive rock containing quartz and feldspar, with more plagioclase relative to alkali feldspar than typical granite.

A rock formed by crystallization of magma or lava. Intrusive bodies crystallize below the surface, while extrusive rocks solidify at or near the surface. Granite is a common intrusive example and basalt a common extrusive example.

A useful idealization is a thin sedimentary cover over a felsic upper continental crust, an intermediate middle continental crust, and a more mafic lower continental crust, ending at the Mohorovičić discontinuity at about 35–40 km. The boundaries within the continental crust are approximate compositional divisions, not three universal sharp interfaces.

The important trend is increasing average mafic character with depth, rather than a change from granite directly to peridotite. Granulite describes a metamorphic facies, not a unique chemical composition. The synthesis in Nature and composition of the continental crust: A lower crustal perspective by Roberta L. Rudnick and David M. Fountain combines seismic and petrological evidence for these distinctions.

The expected broad contrast is a less mature, commonly thinner early juvenile continental crust, with more mafic material and abundant sodic tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite, rather than the more differentiated, potassium-rich granitoid component characteristic of much Phanerozoic continental crust. This is a secular tendency, not a single stratified column applicable throughout the Archean.

Archean terrains commonly expose tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite gneiss associated with greenstone belts containing basalt, komatiite and metasedimentary rocks. Many later granitoids are richer in potassium, including granite and granodiorite. The proportions changed during the Archean: a reconstruction from trace element ratios in sedimentary rocks infers a markedly mafic upper continental crust before about 3.0 Ga and a more felsic upper continental crust by 2.5 Ga. Thus “all Archean continental crust was mafic” would be wrong. A preserved tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite-dominated nucleus can be strongly felsic, including at depth; its composition is not identical to that of its original juvenile precursor.^[ref]

Thickness needs a stated comparison. An influential seismic compilation found preserved Archean crust about 27–40 km thick, commonly without the thick high-velocity basal layer of its 40–55 km thick Proterozoic comparison provinces. That supports a relatively thin endmember, but is not a measurement of every original Archean continental crust, nor a demonstration that every Archean region was thinner than today's 35–40 km reference column. Tectonic thickening, magmatic underplating, erosion, delamination and preservation bias all alter what survives. The very thick lithospheric mantle beneath a craton must also not be mistaken for thick continental crust.^[ref]

The transferable answer is therefore more mafic early juvenile precursors, widespread sodic tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite production, and variable thickness evolving through time; late Archean felsic nuclei can already resemble substantial modern continental crust.

Retain the same regional-background assumption as in part (b). The northern pluton is about $2.0\mathrm{km}$ thick beneath the station near the northern trough, while its gravity anomaly is about $-114\mathrm{mGal}$. Its anomaly relative to the greenstone maximum is approximately $-14\mathrm{mGal}$. Therefore the contrast equation isUsing the result of part (b), the second term contributes $15\mathrm{mGal}$, leaving a net pluton anomaly of about $+1\mathrm{mGal}$. Hence ${\rho }_{\mathrm{gr}}\simeq 2680\mathrm{kg}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$, effectively close to the host-rock density at the precision of this diagram.

The apparent trough is strongly negative relative to the greenstone belt, but hardly negative relative to the southern host-rock background. If a northward regional trend is intended instead, it must be stated: in general,with both gravity values in milligals. For example, a northern background of $-109\mathrm{mGal}$ would give ${\rho }_{\mathrm{gr}}\simeq 2610\mathrm{kg}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$, but the same reference would also change part (b). No regional curve is explicitly identified in the supplied figure, so the numerical result must retain its reference-field assumption. This is the geological nonuniqueness of geophysical inversion of potential-field interpretation, rather than a reason to force a presumed textbook granite density onto the plot.

Measure total magnetic field along the same south–north line with a calibrated magnetometer, recording position, time and sensor height. A simultaneous base-station magnetometer measures temporal variation so that diurnal changes can be removed from the moving survey. Avoid disturbed periods and magnetic contamination from vehicles, fences, power lines and equipment. Choose station spacing much smaller than the expected anomaly width, for example tens to hundreds of metres for a kilometre-scale target.

Subtract the epoch-appropriate International Geomagnetic Reference Field or another stated regional main-field model to obtain a total-field magnetic anomaly. Level overlapping traverses and remove offsets or drift where appropriate. Accurate terrain/sensor geometry is needed for comparison with a geological model, but there is no universal magnetic analogue of a constant-density Bouguer slab correction: the effect depends on the distribution and direction of magnetization. Measure magnetic susceptibility and remanent magnetization on representative greenstones, granite and host rock to test the assumed magnetic sources.

Assume the greenstone belt is more magnetically susceptible than the host rocks and granite, its magnetization is mainly induced magnetization, and the body is roughly east–west elongated so that the south–north line crosses it. At southern magnetic latitudes the main field has negative magnetic inclination in a north-and-down coordinate convention. The total-field magnetic anomaly is then generally asymmetric: the principal negative lobe is on the southern side and the positive lobe is displaced northward for the simple induced source illustrated here. The exact lobe sizes and peak positions depend on body geometry and the actual magnetic inclination.^[ref]

An explicit sketching model is an induced magnetic dipole at depth $d$. With northward coordinate $x$, $\mathbf{r}=(x,-d)$ and unit field direction $\hat{\mathbf{F}}=(\cos I,\sin I)$, its normalized total-field magnetic anomaly isThe plot uses $I=-36^{\circ }$ only as an illustrative dipole-field inclination for a latitude near $20^{\circ }$ south, not a measured modern field at the site. A wide greenstone belt would broaden the response and can produce prominent edge anomalies. Remanent magnetization or a magnetic granite could change the sketch substantially; gravity alone cannot identify the magnetic source.

A body of igneous rock crystallized from magma emplaced beneath the surface. Granite is a common plutonic composition. A pluton's gravity anomaly depends on its geophysical density contrast and geometry, rather than on the rock name alone.

A felsic volcanic rock broadly corresponding in bulk composition to granite.