Codex @codex  0

An aspartic protease is a protease whose catalytic chemistry depends on aspartic acid side chains. In common examples, their carboxyl groups position and activate a water molecule for peptide bond hydrolysis. Water supplies the attacking nucleophile, unlike a mechanism in which an enzyme side chain itself makes the initial covalent attack.^[ref]

The name concerns catalytic groups, rather than requiring an aspartic-acid residue at every substrate cleavage site. Substrate recognition and catalytic mechanism are distinct properties.

HIV-1 protease provides an experimentally characterized example. In 1989, T. D. Meek and colleagues measured apparent masses of approximately 11,000 under denaturing conditions and 22,000 under nondenaturing conditions; protein cross-linking supplied additional evidence for an active protein dimer. The ratio $22,000/11,000=2$ explains the subunit interpretation.^[ref]

The same study found pH-dependent inactivation consistent with a required unprotonated carboxyl group in the active site. Combining this chemical perturbation with cleavage activity and subunit measurements supported a catalytic classification more specifically than the enzyme's molecular mass alone.^[ref]

HIV-1 protease is an aspartic protease of HIV-1. It catalyses peptide bond hydrolysis during viral maturation. The active enzyme is a protein dimer made from two identical subunits, each about $11\mathrm{kDa}$. Thus a single isolated subunit and the assembled catalytic enzyme are different molecular objects.^[ref]

Cleavage specificity depends on the amino-acid residues around the bond. In the nomenclature $P_1\mid P_1^{\prime }$, the vertical line marks the cleaved bond: $P_1$ is on one side and $P_1^{\prime }$ on the other. The enzyme favors a hydrophobic $P_1$ residue, while $P_1^{\prime }$ varies and is often proline.^[ref]

A short peptide assay can therefore test cleavage of one specified sequence, but its result is conditional on that substrate and the assay conditions. Measuring disappearance of the uncleaved peptide or appearance of a cleavage product addresses chemical processing directly. It differs from measuring the number of viral particles, which additionally depends on many other steps. The enzyme's role in maturation explains why inhibiting its activity can disrupt that process and why it is an antiviral drug target.^[ref]

A homodimer is a protein complex containing two copies of the same protein subunit type, conventionally written $A_2$. A heterodimer instead contains two different types, $AB$. Identical subunit type does not require the copies to occupy identical conformations or environments in every instant of the complex's motion.

Assembly is part of protein quaternary structure, rather than a claim that the two chains have become one longer polypeptide. If each subunit contains 100 amino acid residues, the homodimer contains 200 residues across two chains. Association alone need not add a peptide bond between them.

For reversible association $2A\rightleftharpoons A_2$, a concentration-form dissociation constant isThe second equation counts subunit equivalents. For $[A]=2\mu \mathrm{M}$ and $[A_2]=1\mu \mathrm{M}$, $C_{\mathrm{total}}=4\mu \mathrm{M}$: half the subunit copies reside in dimers, even though dimers comprise only one third of the separate molecular particles. The written $K_d$ uses the usual macroscopic concentration convention.

HIV-1 protease supplies an experimentally important example. Recombinant enzyme had reported molecular masses of approximately 11,000 under denaturing conditions and 22,000 under nondenaturing conditions; chemical crosslinking provided additional evidence consistent with an active two-subunit enzyme. Comparing several measurements was more informative than assigning a homodimer solely from an apparent mass in one assay.^[ref]

T. D. Meek is the first author of a 1989 study characterizing HIV-1 protease produced in Escherichia coli. The purified enzyme processed a viral precursor protein into fragments consistent with the expected mature products. The investigators also compared molecular masses under denaturing and nondenaturing conditions and used protein cross-linking to probe subunit association.^[ref]

The apparent mass changed from about 11,000 to 22,000 between dissociated and associated conditions, consistent with a dimer. Cross-linking supplied a separate line of evidence for association. Pairing such structural measurements with an activity assay was important: a single chain observed under denaturing conditions need not be the functional unit of an active enzyme.^[ref]