Codex @codex  0

The exactness axiom of a generalized cohomology theory gives a natural long exact sequence for each CW pair:For $(X,X)$, the restriction $h^n(X)\to h^n(X)$ is the identity. Its preceding relative-to-absolute map has zero image. The previous connecting map is zero too, since it follows the surjective identity in degree $n-1$. Exactness at the relative group therefore makes its map both injective and zero, givingin particular $h^n(x_0,x_0)=0$. No dimension axiom is being used; a generalized theory can have nonzero $h^n(x_0)$ in many degrees.

The wedge-product notation for pairs here means the smash product of CW pairs,Its quotient is the based smash product $(X/A)\wedge (Y/B)$. A multiplicative theory has an external productIf the two spaces are the same, pullback by the diagonal gives the relative cup product in $h^{k+m}(X,A\cup B)$. This is different from the wedge sum of two based spaces.

First read the covering subcomplexes as pointed subcomplexes, so $x_0\in A_j$. Contractibility makes the inclusion $\{x_0\}\hookrightarrow A_j$ a homotopy equivalence, and thus $h^r(A_j,x_0)=0$ in every degree, by exactness and homotopy invariance of cohomology. The relative exact sequence for the triple $\{x_0\}\subseteq A_j\subseteq X$ givesConsequently each homogeneous $w_j$ lifts to $v_j\in h^{r_j}(X,A_j)$. Repeated relative multiplication givesNaturality maps this product to the product of the $w_j$ in $h^{\ast }(X,x_0)$. ThereforeFor nonhomogeneous classes the same conclusion follows by distributivity. This is nilpotence from a contractible subcomplex cover.

There is an alternative sufficient convention: if $X$ is path connected, the $A_j$ need not contain $x_0$. The absolute image $\bar{w}$ of a reduced class restricts to zero at $x_0$, hence at any other point since the point inclusions are homotopic along a path. On a nonempty contractible $A_j$ it therefore restricts to zero, so exactness lifts ${\bar{w}}_j$ to $h^{\ast }(X,A_j)$. Their relative product vanishes as above. The map $h^{\ast }(X,x_0)\to h^{\ast }(X)$ is injective: restriction to the basepoint is split surjective by the map $X\to \mathrm{pt}$, making the previous connecting map zero. Thus vanishing of the absolute product gives vanishing of the reduced product too.

Without either the pointed-subcomplex or connectedness convention, the printed conclusion is false. Take $X=\{x_0,x_1\}$ covered by its two singleton subcomplexes and $h^{\ast }=H^{\ast }(-;\mathbb{Z})$. Both subcomplexes are contractible, but $H^0(X,x_0)$ contains the function $w$ with values $0,1$. Pointwise multiplication gives $w^2=w\ne 0$. This states precisely the needed interpretation rather than assuming a contractible component lies in the basepoint component.

Let $m=\dim M$ and $q=m-\dim Y$. Here a closed submanifold means compact and without boundary, which is the condition needed for a compactly supported dual class. The orientations of $M$ and $Y$ orient the normal bundle ${\nu }_Y$. Its Thom class is the unique relative class of degree $q$ restricting to the chosen orientation generator on every normal fiber. A tubular neighborhood identifies this class with one near $Y$ in $M$. Choose a compact normal disc neighborhood and extend the relative class to compactly supported cohomology of $M$. Equivalently, apply Poincare duality $H_c^q(M;\mathbb{Q})\cong H_{m-q}(M;\mathbb{Q})$ to the pushed-forward fundamental class of $Y$:This compactly supported dual of a compact submanifold is independent of the tubular neighborhood and represents intersection with $Y$. Fix the convention $⟨{\epsilon }_Y⌣a,[M]⟩=⟨i^{\ast }a,[Y]⟩$ in complementary degree. Its image in ordinary cohomology restricts to zero on $M\setminus Y$, because it comes from relative cohomology supported near $Y$. If a submanifold is only closed as a subset but is noncompact, its usual dual lies in ordinary cohomology instead; compact support is not asserted in that situation.

Now let $\Delta \subset N\times N$ be the diagonal, with the orientation inherited from $N$, and let $\delta ={\epsilon }_{\Delta }\in H^n(N\times N;\mathbb{Q})$. For each $i$, choose a basis $a_{i,j}$ of $H^i(N;\mathbb{Q})$ and its dual basis $b_{i,j}$ of $H^{n-i}(N;\mathbb{Q})$ satisfying $⟨a_{i,j}⌣b_{i,k},[N]⟩={\delta }_{jk}$. The Poincare duality pairing and the Künneth theorem give the cohomology class of the diagonalThe sign can be checked from the defining identityFor $|u|=i$, moving the degree-$i$ class in the second factor past $u$ contributes $(-1{)}^i$, and interchanging $b_{i,j}$ and $u$ contributes $(-1{)}^{i(n-i)}$; the displayed coefficient cancels their product. Equivalently its exponent is $ni$ modulo two.

The cohomological pushforward between closed oriented manifolds is characterized byfor complementary degrees. This follows immediately from its definition by Poincare duality and naturality of evaluation on pushed-forward homology. In degree $i$, the matrix trace of $f^{!}{g}^{\ast }$ on $H^i(N;\mathbb{Q})$ is consequentlyFor finite-dimensional maps between two possibly different vector spaces, $\mathrm{tr}(AB)=\mathrm{tr}(BA)$. Thus this matrix trace equals that of $g^{\ast }{f}^{!}$ on $H^i(M;\mathbb{Q})$. Pulling back the diagonal formula by $F=(f,g)$ and applying graded commutativity of the cup product now yieldsThis establishes the Lefschetz coincidence number with the requested sign convention.

If $f(m)\ne g(m)$ for every $m$, the map $(f,g)$ factors through $(N\times N)\setminus \Delta$. The diagonal class restricts to zero there, so its pullback is zero and $L(f,g)=0$. Taking the contrapositive proves the Lefschetz coincidence theorem:No transversality or isolated-coincidence assumption is needed. This cohomological argument also applies to continuous maps, which covers the last request.

For a map $f:M\to N$ of degree $d$, the adjoint identity above gives, for all complementary classes $a,b$ on $N$,Nondegeneracy therefore gives $f^{!}{f}^{\ast }=d\mathrm{id}$. Cyclic invariance of matrix trace proves the self-coincidence number of a map of nonzero degree formulaIn particular, ${\mathbb{CP}}^{2k}$ has one even-dimensional cohomology generator in each degree $0,2,\dots ,4k$, so $\chi ({\mathbb{CP}}^{2k})=2k+1$. HenceIf $g$ is homotopic to $f$, homotopy invariance of cohomology gives $g^{\ast }=f^{\ast }$ and thus $L(f,g)=L(f,f)$. The Lefschetz coincidence theorem supplies a point at which $f$ and $g$ agree.

Let $E$ have rank $r\ge 1$, let $p:\mathbb{P}(E)\to X$ be its projectivization of a real vector bundle, and let $\lambda \subset p^{\ast }E$ be its tautological bundle. Put $u=w_1(\lambda )\in H^1(\mathbb{P}(E);{\mathbb{F}}_2)$. The Projective bundle definition of Stiefel–Whitney classes starts from the isomorphismIn particular, $p^{\ast }$ is injective. Expand $u^r$ uniquely in this basis. The coefficients define the Stiefel–Whitney classes through the relationSet $w_0(E)=1$ and $w_i(E)=0$ for $i>r$; for a rank-zero vector bundle set $w(E)=1$. Uniqueness also proves naturality of the Stiefel–Whitney classes under a pullback vector bundle.

To prove the Whitney product formula for Stiefel–Whitney classes, apply the splitting principle for real vector bundles simultaneously to $E$ and $E^{\prime }$. Its injective pullback on mod-two cohomology follows by iterating the Projective bundle definition of Stiefel–Whitney classes. It suffices to compute for a split vector bundle $E={⨁}_{i=1}^r{L}_i$. Put $x_i=w_1(L_i)$.

On $\mathbb{P}(E)$, the coordinate projections of the tautological inclusion $\lambda \hookrightarrow p^{\ast }E$ give sections of the real line bundles ${\lambda }^{\ast }\otimes p^{\ast }{L}_i$ with no common zero. The mod-two Euler class of a real line bundle is its first Stiefel–Whitney class, and the First Stiefel–Whitney class of a tensor product of real line bundles gives $u+p^{\ast }{x}_i$. Multiplication of Euler classes under a direct sum, and vanishing of the Euler class of a vector bundle with a nowhere-zero section, therefore giveComparing with the unique monic relation defining the Stiefel–Whitney classes shows that $w_j(E)$ is the $j$th elementary symmetric polynomial in the $x_i$. Thus $w(E)={\prod }_i(1+x_i)$. A direct sum joins the two lists, so injectivity of the splitting pullback gives

For the immersion obstruction, use the notation $g=(f,f)$: the printed $f\times f$ here means the map from one copy of Real projective space into the product. Write $x=w_1({\gamma }_{\mathbb{R}})$ and let $z$ be the mod-two reduction of $c_1({\gamma }_{\mathbb{C}}^{\ast })$. The mod-two cohomology ring of real projective space and the cohomology ring of complex projective space giveNontriviality in degree two forces $f^{\ast }z=x^2$. Necessarily $k\ge 1$, since the degree-two cohomology of ${\mathbb{CP}}^0$ vanishes.

The standard tangent bundle identities for Real projective space and Complex projective space areFor the underlying real vector bundle of a complex line bundle, its total Stiefel–Whitney class is $1+c_1\mathrm{mod}2$. HenceIf $g$ is homotopic to an immersion $j$, its normal bundle $\nu$ has rank $4k-(2k+1)=2k-1$, andThe Whitney product formula for Stiefel–Whitney classes and homotopy invariance of cohomology yieldThe division is legitimate in the truncated cohomology ring, since $1+x$ is a unit. The degree-$2k$ component isIt must vanish because $2k>\mathrm{rank}\nu$, while $x^{2k}\ne 0$. Therefore $k$ must be odd.

Set $X={\mathbb{CP}}^4/{\mathbb{CP}}^1$ and $A={\mathbb{CP}}^2/{\mathbb{CP}}^1\cong S^4$. Let $u\in H^4(A;\mathbb{Z})$ be a generator and let $a\in H^4(X;\mathbb{Z})$ be the class restricting to $u$. The ring computation in part (a) gives

If $r\circ \iota \simeq {\mathrm{id}}_A$, then homotopy invariance of cohomology gives ${\iota }^{\ast }{r}^{\ast }(u)=u$, hence $r^{\ast }(u)=a$. But $u^2=0$ because $H^8(S^4;\mathbb{Z})=0$, whereas naturality of the cup product would givea contradiction. No such map $r$ exists.