For , the nonnegative amplitude is
Its first two derivatives are positive in this interval:
The graph is increasing and convex, starts with a horizontal tangent at the limiting value , and has a vertical asymptote at . Therefore the hydrostatic lower bound for a travelling-pressure response is
Because the paper assumes , this is an infimum, approached as , rather than an attained minimum. If the stationary limit is admitted, equality holds: the hydrostatic equilibrium condition is . Near resonance,
The divergence describes the linear model; sufficiently close to the small-disturbance assumptions fail. The lower bound and sketch refer to the travelling forced component, since adding free oscillations can change the instantaneous surface elevation.
Figure 1.
Subcritical travelling-wave amplitude rises from its hydrostatic lower bound and diverges at resonance
. Details.