Codex @codex  0

In a category with pullback in a category constructions and image factorizations, direct image ${\exists }_f(A^{\prime })=\mathrm{im}(A^{\prime }\hookrightarrow A\stackrel{f}{\to }B)$ is a left adjoint to inverse image on subobjects. Frobenius reciprocity is ${\exists }_f(A^{\prime }\cap f^{\ast }{B}^{\prime })={\exists }_f(A^{\prime })\cap B^{\prime }$. It holds for all such subobjects exactly when strong epimorphisms are stable under pullback along monomorphisms. For sufficiency pull the strong part of the image factorization back along the mono into its intersection with $B^{\prime }$; for necessity take $A^{\prime }=A$ and $f$ strong, whose image is the whole codomain.

Take two copies of the category of rings, identify their terminal zero rings, and adjoin a strict initial object $\perp$. Same-copy finite categorical limits are ordinary ring limits; products of nonzero objects in different copies are $\perp$. Ring surjections and $1_{\perp }$ are precisely the strong epimorphisms. They are stable under pullback along monomorphisms, so image factorizations exist and Frobenius reciprocity for subobjects holds. But pulling $\mathbb{Z}$ in one copy $\to 0$ back along $\mathbb{Z}[x]$ in the other copy $\to 0$ gives $\perp \to \mathbb{Z}[x]$. This is not epic: evaluations $x\mapsto 0,1$ agree after precomposing with it. Thus the category is not regular, since strong epimorphisms would then be regular and pullback-stable.

A regular category has finite limits, coequalizers of kernel pairs, and regular epimorphisms stable under pullback. Equivalently, every morphism factors as a regular epimorphism followed by a monomorphism, and these factorizations are stable under pullback. A regular functor preserves finite limits and regular epimorphisms, hence also preserves these image factorizations.

For this question, the capital regular category convention is the one in which every well-supported object is a well-pointed object in a category. Here an object $A$ is well-supported if $A\to 1$ is a regular epimorphism. It is well-pointed if a subobject $m:B\hookrightarrow A$ through which every point $1\to A$ factors must be the whole object. This convention is documented in Definitions 1.1–1.3. It imposes no such point-detection requirement on objects whose support is a proper subobject of $1$. In particular, it should not be replaced here by the stronger assertion that $\mathcal{A}(1,-)$ reflects every isomorphism.

First prove two facts about a capital regular category $\mathcal{A}$. Every well-supported object $A$ has a point. Otherwise $A\times A$ is well-supported and has no points, so its diagonal $A\hookrightarrow A\times A$ contains all points and is invertible. That makes $A$ a subterminal object; the regular epimorphism $A\to 1$ is then also monic and hence invertible, contradicting the absence of a point. If $e:X\to Y$ is a regular epimorphism and $y:1\to Y$ is a point, its pullback in a category is a well-supported object over $1$, so it has a point lifting $y$. Thus the representable functorpreserves regular epimorphisms; it already preserves all existing limits. Hence $\Gamma$ is a regular functor. Second, if $\Gamma X$ is a singleton, its unique point $x:1\to X$ is a monomorphism, $X$ is well-supported, and $x$ contains all points of $X$. Well-pointedness makes $x$ invertible. Thus $\Gamma$ reflects terminal objects, even though it need not reflect arbitrary isomorphisms.

Now let $\mathcal{C}$ be a small category that is a regular category. For each object $B$, its slice category $\mathcal{C}/B$ is small and regular: finite limits, images and the stability of regular epimorphisms are computed using the corresponding constructions in $\mathcal{C}$. By the permitted capitalization result choose a conservative functor that is regular,with ${\mathcal{A}}_B$ a small capital regular category. The base-change functor $B^{\ast }:\mathcal{C}\to \mathcal{C}/B$, given by $X\mapsto (X\times B\to B)$, preserves finite limits and regular epimorphisms. So doesTaking these as the coordinates defines a regular functorThe exponent is a set of indices, so this is a power of the Category of sets, with finite limits and regular epimorphisms computed coordinatewise.

To prove reflection of isomorphisms, suppose $R(f)$ is invertible for $f:A\to B$. In $\mathcal{C}/B$, the object $(A,f)$ is the pullback of $B^{\ast }f:(A\times B\to B)\to (B\times B\to B)$ along the point given by the diagonal $B\to B\times B$. Applying ${\Gamma }_B{J}_B$ shows that ${\Gamma }_B{J}_B(A,f)$ is the fibre of the bijection $R_B(f)$ over this diagonal point, and is a singleton. The preceding lemma gives $J_B(A,f)\cong 1$ through its canonical arrow to $1$. Since $J_B$ reflects isomorphisms, $(A,f)\to (B,1_B)$ is invertible. Its underlying morphism is $f$. Therefore

In the small-category setting of this representation result, the elementary condition for replacing the power by one copy of $\mathbf{Set}$ is:This is almost total support for a regular category. “Strict initial” means initial and every arrow into it is invertible; the condition allows the case in which all objects are well-supported and no initial object exists.

For necessity, let $V:\mathcal{C}\to \mathbf{Set}$ be regular and conservative. If $VA\ne \varnothing$, factor $A\to 1$ through its support of an object in a regular category $S\hookrightarrow 1$. Preservation of images gives $VS=1$. Conservativity makes $S\to 1$ invertible, so $A$ is well-supported. If $VA=\varnothing$, then for every $X$ the projection $A\times X\to A$ is sent to the bijection $\varnothing \to \varnothing$, hence is invertible. Its inverse followed by the other projection supplies an arrow $A\to X$. For any two such arrows, their equalizer is sent to a bijection onto $VA$, hence is invertible, proving uniqueness. Thus $A$ is initial. If $X\to A$ exists, then $VX\to \varnothing$ exists, so $VX=\varnothing$ and that arrow is sent to a bijection. Conservativity makes it invertible. Hence $A$ is strict initial.

For sufficiency, choose the permitted conservative regular functor $J:\mathcal{C}\to \mathcal{A}$ into a small capital regular category, and put $V=\Gamma J$. This is regular. A well-supported object of $\mathcal{C}$ is sent to a well-supported object of $\mathcal{A}$, which has a point. A non-well-supported object is strict initial by the condition, and is consequently a proper subterminal object. The functor $J$ preserves subterminality and reflects the noninvertibility of its arrow to $1$; its image is a proper subterminal object and has no points. Thus $VA$ is empty exactly on the non-well-supported objects.

Suppose $Vf$ is a bijection for $f:A\to B$. If both sets are empty, $A$ and $B$ are strict initial objects and $f$ is invertible. Otherwise $A,B$ are well-supported. Factor $Jf$ as a regular epimorphism followed by a monomorphism $m:I\hookrightarrow JB$. Surjectivity of $Vf$ makes every point of $JB$ factor through $m$; capitality of $\mathcal{A}$ makes $m$ invertible. Hence $Jf$ is a regular epimorphism. Its kernel pair $P=JA{\times }_{JB}JA$ is well-supported, because $P\to JA$ and $JA\to 1$ are regular epimorphisms. Injectivity of $Vf$ implies that every point of $P$ has equal coordinates, and therefore factors through the diagonal $JA\hookrightarrow P$. Since $P$ is well-pointed, this diagonal is invertible. Thus $Jf$ is also monic, hence an isomorphism, and conservativity of $J$ makes $f$ invertible. This proves sufficiency with actual point and image arguments, rather than asserting that global sections of every capital regular category is conservative.

A regular category has finite categorical limits, coequalizers of kernel pairs, and regular epimorphism–monomorphism image factorizations whose regular epimorphisms are stable under every pullback in a category. Equivalently, finite limits, pullback-stable regular epimorphism–monomorphism factorizations suffice. In particular, every strong epimorphism in a regular category is regular.

For the weaker hypotheses here, interpret an image factorization as $f=me$ with $m:I\hookrightarrow B$ the least subobject through which $f$ factors, and $e:A\to I$ a strong epimorphism. With pullback in a category constructions, the least-subobject characterization itself implies that $e$ is strong: in a lifting square against a monomorphism, pull that monomorphism back to $I$; since $e$ factors through this pullback, image minimality forces its mono into $I$ to be invertible, giving the required diagonal. Thus the two descriptions of images agree under the stated hypotheses.

For $a:A^{\prime }\hookrightarrow A$, define ${\exists }_f(A^{\prime })$ as the image factorization subobject of $fa:A^{\prime }\to B$. For $b:B^{\prime }\hookrightarrow B$, the pullback in a category universal property and image minimality giveHenceThis is an adjunction between the posets of subobjects.

For Frobenius reciprocity for subobjects, factor $fa=me$ through its image $m:I\hookrightarrow B$, and put $P=I{\times }_B{B}^{\prime }$. Its mono into $B$ represents ${\exists }_f(A^{\prime })\cap B^{\prime }$. The pullback in a category of $e$ along the monomorphism $P\to I$ has domain canonically $A^{\prime }{\times }_B{B}^{\prime }$, which represents $A^{\prime }\cap f^{\ast }(B^{\prime })$. If strong epimorphisms are stable under pullback along monomorphisms, that pulled-back arrow is strong, so its composite with $P\hookrightarrow B$ is an image factorization. This givesEquality here is equality of subobjects, hence an isomorphism of their representatives.

Conversely, let $e:X\to Y$ be a strong epimorphism and $b:B^{\prime }\hookrightarrow Y$ be monic. Its image is all of $Y$: in any image factorization of $e$, the lifting property makes the mono invertible. Apply Frobenius reciprocity for subobjects to $f=e$ and $A^{\prime }=X$. The induced morphism $p:X{\times }_Y{B}^{\prime }\to B^{\prime }$ has image all of $B^{\prime }$, because the image of $bp$ in $Y$ is $B^{\prime }$. Its image factorization therefore has invertible mono, so $p$ is a strong epimorphism. This proves the converse.

We now use the glued ring categories counterexample to regularity. All rings and ring homomorphisms are unital; the zero ring, where $0=1$, is allowed. It is the terminal object of $\mathbf{Rng}$, and there is no unital ring homomorphism from it to a nonzero ring. Denote the common zero ring by $Z$, and the newly adjoined strict initial object by $\perp$. Nonzero objects in different copies have no morphisms between them. There is one morphism from every object to $Z$ and from $\perp$ to every object, and no morphism into $\perp$ except its identity.

Finite products in a category and equalizers can be described explicitly. The terminal object is $Z$. The product in a category of two nonzero objects in one copy is their ordinary ring product; the product in a category of nonzero objects in different copies is $\perp$, since only $\perp$ can map to both. A product with $Z$ is the other factor, and one with $\perp$ is $\perp$. For parallel morphisms between nonzero objects in the same copy, the ordinary ring equalizer works; it is nonzero because its subring contains distinct $0$ and $1$. All other parallel pairs are equal, and their equalizer is the identity of the domain. Thus the construction of small limits from products and equalizers gives all finite categorical limits.

Within either ring copy, monomorphisms are precisely injective ring homomorphisms: maps from $\mathbb{Z}[x]$ detect unequal elements. The only monos from outside a copy are the maps $\perp \to X$, and the only subobjects of $Z$ are $\perp$ and $Z$. Indeed a nonzero ring $R$ is not subterminal, since $\mathbb{Z}[x]\to R$ can send $x$ to $0$ or to $1$.

Ordinary ring-image factorizations remain image factorizations in the glued category. Their surjective parts remain strong epimorphisms: a lifting square into a nonzero ring stays in one copy; a square into $Z$ with mono $\perp \to Z$ would require a nonexistent map from a noninitial domain to $\perp$. Maps with domain $\perp$ are already monic and have identity strong part. Conversely, a strong epimorphism within a ring copy has surjective ring image, since its mono image part must be invertible. A map $\perp \to X$ with $X\ne \perp$ is monic but noninvertible, and therefore cannot be strong. This classifies the strong epimorphisms as the identities of $\perp$ and the surjective homomorphisms in the copies, including maps to $Z$.

Pullback along a monomorphism within a copy preserves those surjections, using the given regularity of $\mathbf{Rng}$. Pullback along $\perp \to X$ gives $1_{\perp }$, and these exhaust the additional monos, including those into $Z$. Thus strong epimorphisms are stable under pullback along monos, so Frobenius reciprocity for subobjects holds.

However, let $e:{\mathbb{Z}}_{\mathcal{D}}\to Z$ be the surjective ring homomorphism in the first copy, and pull it back along $\mathbb{Z}[x{]}_{\mathcal{E}}\to Z$ in the other copy. The resulting arrow isIt is not even an epimorphism, since the distinct evaluation ring homomorphisms $x\mapsto 0$ and $x\mapsto 1$ to ${\mathbb{Z}}_{\mathcal{E}}$ agree after composing with $\perp \to \mathbb{Z}[x{]}_{\mathcal{E}}$. Since $e$ is strong, it would be a regular epimorphism in a regular category, whose pullbacks must be regular, in particular epic. Therefore the glued category has finite limits and images and satisfies Frobenius reciprocity, but is not regular.

A functor between regular categories is regular if it preserves finite limits and regular epimorphisms. It then preserves image factorizations, since finite-limit preservation preserves monomorphisms. A representable functor $\mathcal{C}(P,-)$ is regular exactly when $P$ is projective with respect to regular epimorphisms. Regularity of a functor does not alone imply faithfulness or reflection of isomorphisms.