Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 202 6 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
The Itô formula for gives the stochastic differential equationWrite for its continuous local martingale part. Its clock is the quadratic variationBecause , is strictly increasing. For , its inverse satisfies and . The Dambis-Dubins-Schwarz theorem, or the Lévy characterization of Brownian motion after the optional time-change theorem, makes a Brownian motion for the time-changed filtration. With ,This is the Bessel process equation with dimension , on the positive stochastic interval. This establishes the Exponential Brownian-to-Bessel time change.
The lifetime convention is important: the inverse is defined only for . If , the strong law for Brownian motion gives , so exponentially and . Then as , and this is its first hit of zero after continuous extension. If the clock diverges by the same strong law. If it diverges by infinite occupation time of one-dimensional Brownian motion on a bounded interval, since is bounded below there. Thus the lifetime is infinite when . Negative dimensions are interpreted by the same positive-state equation killed at zero; no post-zero Bessel process behavior is asserted.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 202 4 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Under the corrected orthogonality hypothesis, the preceding quadratic variation calculation gives . We justify the needed infinite occupation time of one-dimensional Brownian motion, rather than inferring an infinite integral from recurrent visits alone.
Let , and recursively let be the first exit of from after , and its first return to zero after . Recurrence of one-dimensional Brownian motion makes these stopping times finite almost surely. The Strong Markov property shows that are independent and identically distributed random variables, each strictly positive. Choose with . The Borel-Cantelli lemma gives infinitely many such durations and hence almost surely. These intervals are disjoint, and on each, soThis proves the intended conclusion. Without the orthogonality correction, the printed setup gives instead the more general quadratic variation in the previous part; it does not justify identifying that quantity with . The proof here is explicitly for the corrected setup.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 202 6 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
The infinite occupation time of one-dimensional Brownian motion impliesFor a start , first wait until hits zero, which happens in finite time by recurrence of one-dimensional Brownian motion, and apply the Strong Markov property. The repeated exit-and-return argument in Question 4(c) then proves the infinite occupation integral. Since , the Feynman-Kac formula gives . The random variables increase to infinity almost surely; the monotone convergence theorem therefore yields the intended positive-potential growth from Brownian recurrence:Under global boundedness, no such solution exists when the initial function is bounded below by a positive constant. The PDF prints ; if the subscript means bounded over the whole product, its hypotheses with are incompatible, rather than an example of growth within that class. The precise correction is to require and its indicated derivatives to be bounded on for every finite . The derivation above then gives the requested limit. Already satisfies the printed initial-data assumption but cannot have a globally bounded classical solution, by this formula. Also the PDF's in this clause reverses the argument order from used in the equation; the limit above keeps the equation's time-first convention.
Suppose bounded is bounded below by a positive constant on some nonempty open interval, and . The Feynman-Kac formula with a bounded potential gives . Infinite occupation time of one-dimensional Brownian motion makes that integral tend to infinity almost surely. The monotone convergence theorem then gives for every fixed . Thus no globally bounded classical solution exists under these hypotheses, although boundedness on every finite time slab is compatible with the conclusion.