Take the following bounded analytic example for a dimensionless positive coupling , with fixed and :
Increasing means increasing observation length , hence motion toward the infrared fixed point. This convention matters: if the inverse-length scale is , the same trajectory has renormalization-group beta function . The two derivatives have opposite signs.
To solve the equation, set . It obeys , a linear ordinary differential equation. Therefore
For its denominator is positive, and stays between and . Thus the trajectory is bounded on this domain. The renormalization-group fixed points are and . The derivative of the length-flow right-hand side is : zero is repulsive from positive , whereas has eigenvalue and attracts positive trajectories. Linearization gives near . The inverse-length beta function has positive derivative at the same infrared-attractive point.
For the chosen , take two starting models with and . At , , so their couplings are respectively and . Both move toward , from opposite sides. They are still visibly different: slow decay of an irrelevant operator can leave substantial corrections at accessible lengths. The case stays exactly zero and is outside this positive-coupling basin.
Banks-Zaks fixed point 2026-10-07
A non-Abelian gauge theory can have a weak infrared fixed point when the one-loop coefficient of its renormalization-group beta function is small and positive while the two-loop coefficient is negative. For and evolution in , has the displayed zero and slope . Fundamental-fermion flavor number just below the asymptotic-freedom boundary produces this regime.
For the magnetic theory,
It ceases to be asymptotically free when
This is precisely the lower edge of the electric conformal window. Inside the window both descriptions flow to the same interacting infrared fixed point; below it the magnetic variables provide a weakly coupled infrared description.