For a risk-neutral single-parameter bidder with incentive-compatible type reports, interim utility satisfies wherever the winning probability is continuous. Consequently expected payment is determined by allocation probabilities and the utility of the lowest type. The common normalization must be justified, not obtained from allocation alone.
Two auctions with the same interim allocation probabilities and the same lowest-type utilities have the same interim expected payments under the usual risk-neutral single-parameter incentive conditions. Equal realized payments are not required. This conclusion follows directly from the interim payment identity.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.