A -Suslin set is an -Suslin set with . If injects into , relabelling a Suslin representation shows that every -Suslin set is -Suslin.
Assume the axiom of choice, and let . Every such is -Suslin. To see this, use the elements of Baire space of sequences as labels. For each , put the node
of length into a tree, including its prefixes. The label sequence repeats the same entire real at every position. An infinite branch therefore projects to that particular , rather than merely to a limit of elements of . The projection is exactly .
A bijection between the label set and a cardinal of size converts this into the usual Kappa-Suslin set representation. The well-ordering of the labels uses choice; without it, the real-labelled tree is still available but an ordinal-sized relabelling needs a separate hypothesis.
In ZFC, if is an infinite cardinal number, every -Suslin set is a union of many Kappa-Suslin sets. Let a tree on represent the set. Each branch uses only countably many ordinal labels, so its labels are bounded below , since the successor cardinal is regular in ZFC.
For each restrict to labels below . Since , its projection is a Kappa-Suslin set; taking their union recovers the original projection. The boundedness step requires . It must not be used without a suitable choice or cofinality assumption in settings involving the axiom of determinacy.
In ZFC, every -Suslin set is a union of many analytic sets. A branch through a representing tree uses a countable sequence of countable ordinals. That sequence is bounded below , so restrict the labels successively below .
Each restricted label set is countable and can be encoded by natural numbers; its projection is therefore an analytic set. The union of these projections is the original set. This is the case of Successor-Suslin decomposition. The proof explicitly uses the uncountable cofinality of and countable recoding, hypotheses that need care without the axiom of choice.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.