Karen Kent is the first-listed author of the 2006 Guide to Integrating Forensic Techniques into Incident Response by Karen Kent and others. The guide connects digital forensics to investigating computer security incidents and operational faults, separating collection, examination, analysis and reporting.[ref]
Guide to Integrating Forensic Techniques into Incident Response by Karen Kent and others. Title page; §2.1, printedp.2-2; §3
A technical distinction in that workflow is preserving data integrity while separately evaluating what collected data establishes. The guide describes comparing message digests of original and copied data.[ref]
Guide to Integrating Forensic Techniques into Incident Response by Karen Kent and others. §3.1.2, printedp.3-4, data-integrity verification
For an original counterexample, suppose two computer files contain the same two bytes, with hexadecimal values and , but their recorded paths and creation times differ. A deterministic cryptographic hash function applied only to those content bytes returns the same value for both. That comparison does not establish equality of their file metadata, identify who created either file, or prove when an event occurred. The input being hashed determines what the comparison can support.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.