Five color theorem 2026-10-14
Every finite planar graph admits a proper vertex coloring with at most five colors. Euler formula for a connected planar graph supplies a vertex of degree at most five. Inductively color its deletion. The only obstruction is five differently colored neighbours in cyclic order. If opposite neighbours 1 and 3 are in different two-color components, interchange one component. If they are connected, planarity prevents opposite neighbours 2 and 4 from being connected in their two-color subgraph, and that interchange frees a color instead. This is a Kempe chain proof.
Four color theorem 2026-10-14
Every finite planar graph has chromatic number at most four. This stronger theorem is distinct from the elementary five colour theorem; the latter's Kempe chain proof does not prove this assertion.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 ii Paper 4 17F Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
For a connected plane drawing, Euler formula for a connected planar graph isFor a simple planar graph with , counting edge sides around faces gives and hence . Thus some vertex has degree at most five. A tree or a graph with bridges obeys the same bound; a face boundary is counted as a closed walk with edge multiplicity, and the small cases are immediate.
Induct on the number of vertices to prove the five colour theorem. Remove a vertex of degree at most five and five-colour the remainder. If fewer than five colors appear at its neighbours, extend the coloring. Otherwise it has five neighbours in their cyclic order, with colors . If the color-1 neighbour is not connected to the color-3 neighbour by a path using only colors 1 and 3, swap these colors in the component containing the former, freeing color 1 at . If they are connected, that path together with its two edges to is a simple closed curve. The colour-2 and colour-4 neighbours lie on opposite sides, so cannot be joined by a path using only colors 2 and 4, which would have to cross it. Swap colors in the component containing the colour-2 neighbour and give color 2. This establishes the induction without the four colour theorem.
For a triangle-free simple planar graph with , the analogous bound is , so some vertex has degree at most three. One can prove the bound for connected graphs with no bridges by ; bridges and isolated components are then joined or split off, with the small tree cases checked directly. Every subgraph is still triangle-free and planar. Successively remove a vertex of degree at most three, and color in reverse order with four colors. Thus triangle-free planar graphs have chromatic number at most four.
Finally, let be minimal 5-chromatic. Removing any vertex leaves a graph colorable with four colors. If its degree is at most three, that coloring extends immediately. If its degree is four, either a colour is unused at its neighbours, or all four appear once in cyclic order. The same two-path argument, now using opposite pairs 1,3 and 2,4, permits a Kempe chain interchange freeing one colour. Therefore a planar minimal 5-chromatic graph must satisfyWithout planarity only follows from the elementary extension argument. The complete graph is a counterexample to the stronger assertion: it is minimal 5-chromatic and every vertex has degree four. Deleting an edge allows its endpoints to share a color; deleting a vertex also reduces the required number of colors.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 4 17G Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
Vizing theorem states that every finite simple graph of maximum degree haswhere is its edge chromatic number. The lower bound follows because all edges incident with a vertex of degree need different colours.
For the upper bound, induct on the number of edges. Delete an edge and colour the remaining graph with the palette . We use the Vizing fan lemma: in a partial proper edge colouring with one uncoloured edge , if the palette has one more colour than the maximum degree, a sequence of fan rotations and two-colour Kempe-chain interchanges makes some colour missing at both ends of the uncoloured edge.
Here is the fan argument. Build a maximal sequence of distinct neighbours of such that, for , the colour on is missing at an earlier fan vertex. Rotating an initial fan segment means moving each colour on to the preceding edge where it is missing; this preserves properness and moves the uncoloured edge to the end of that segment. Choose a colour missing at and a colour missing at . On the maximal - alternating path from , interchange and . If the path does not reach , is then missing at both and , so rotate the fan and colour its final uncoloured edge . If it reaches , its last edge at has colour . Maximality of the fan forces the other endpoint of that edge to be a fan vertex; rotate up to that vertex first. This breaks the alternating path before , reducing to the preceding case. This proves the fan lemma and extends the colouring to , completing the induction.
For , label both vertex classes by and colour edge by . Each colour is a perfect matching, so this is an -edge-colouring. Since , . If , embed into and restrict its -edge-colouring. The degree lower bound then gives
Vizing fan lemma Created 2026-09-29 Updated 2026-10-14
In a partial proper edge colouring with one uncoloured edge incident with a vertex , a Vizing fan is a sequence of neighbours of whose incident edge colours are missing at earlier fan vertices. With one more colour than the maximum degree, fan rotations and a two-colour Kempe chain free one common colour at the endpoints of the uncoloured edge.