Take and , with pointing along the imposed shear stress, and put . Relative to the upper fluid's hydrostatic reference, the hydrostatic pressure in the current is . Thus the horizontal pressure gradient is . The lubrication theory momentum balance, lower no-slip boundary condition, and imposed upper shear stress give
Its depth-integrated volume flux is
Define and . The continuity equation gives the shear-driven viscous gravity current equation
The two terms have opposite roles: imposed shear stress carries fluid downstream, whereas the hydrostatic pressure gradient spreads it from thick regions towards thin ones.
For the approximation, a representative horizontal velocity is , with vertical velocity . Small slopes require . Horizontal fluid inertia relative to vertical viscous resistance is , where . Hence sufficient small parameters, expressed without an unknown velocity, are
For the hydrostatic pressure and normal-stress approximation also require . Its gravity-driven part is already ; its shear-driven part adds
This condition controls viscous normal stress, vertical viscous corrections and the normal projection of shear at a slightly tilted interface relative to . With it and the previous inertia bounds, vertical inertia is small as well. Time variations here are on the transport timescale ; separately imposed rapid forcing would need its own unsteady inertia bound. A small ordinary Reynolds number is a stronger sufficient restriction, but the reduced inertia ratios above are what the thin-layer momentum balance directly requires.
In the steady far-downstream regime, cross-stream derivatives dominate gravity-driven spreading. Dropping the smaller downstream gravity flux leaves
Write and let be a typical central thickness. Balance gives , while conservation of the source volume flux gives . Therefore the downstream similarity of a shear-driven gravity current has
The omitted downstream gravity flux relative to the imposed shear flux is , so this approximation is self-consistent in the stated regime.
For the full profile put . Then and
This is a porous medium equation with downstream distance as its evolution coordinate. Conservation of and a similarity solution , , give
where symmetry gives zero integration constant at . Inside the positive region, , so . Requiring the total downstream volume flux to be fixes the coefficient:
Consequently
for , with outside. The squared height is a parabolic Barenblatt solution; the height cross-section is a semicircular profile after rescaling its axes. The cross-stream volume flux vanishes at the edges even though the height slope becomes singular there. The profile describes the outer lubrication theory region, not a resolved microscopic front.
Near the point source the two horizontal dimensions are comparable, say . Upstream spreading arrests where outward gravity-driven volume flux balances downstream shear-driven volume flux:
Eliminating gives
This is a scaling estimate, not a determination of a numerical prefactor. The associated depth is . The same horizontal scale is obtained by setting in the downstream similarity solution, confirming where that solution fails.
For the line source the steady volume flux per unit width is . On the downstream constant-height branch, gives . Upstream there is no net flux through the finite nose, so . Thus , and continuity of height at the source gives
The line-source upstream reach under imposed shear is therefore
In the upstream part, shear-driven and gravity-driven volume fluxes cancel. The volume flux per unit width jumps by exactly at the source. As in the point-source profile, the square-root nose is a formal outer solution with an unresolved steep front; its finite upstream reach follows from flux balance, not from assuming a small slope all the way to the nose.