Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2003 iii Paper 69 7 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For distinct ordered knots, put . The linear B-spline is the triangular hat supported on , equal to on its rising segment and on its falling segment. Its integral-normalized partner is . ThusFor example, the left overlap is . Nonadjacent hats have disjoint interiors of their supports, so their inner product is zero. The linear-spline mixed Gram matrix therefore has rowRetain only column indices in : the first or last row has no neighbor outside this range. Admissible repeated endpoint knots are obtained by a limit with zero spacings, provided ; a degenerate hat with zero support width is not a basis element.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 70 5 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For on an equidistant spline knot sequence, is the triangular hat with value one at and support . Its slopes on the two pieces are and , and . Direct integration givesNonadjacent hats have disjoint interiors of their supports, so their inner product vanishes. Dividing by therefore givesThis linear-spline mixed Gram matrix is tridiagonal. Every diagonal entry is , including the first and last: the distinct-knot hats have their full supports inside . End rows simply lack one off-diagonal neighbor; there are no repeated endpoint spline knots here.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 70 5 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A strict diagonal dominance argument proves the estimate even on a nonuniform strictly increasing spline knot sequence. Put . Then has a rising piece of length and a falling piece of length , while . The same integrations as in part (b) give the linear-spline mixed Gram matrixOnly entries with indices in are present. Thus in every row.
For , choose an index with . The reverse triangle inequality then yieldsHence . Applying this to every provesThis is the inverse infinity-norm bound from diagonal dominance; no total positivity theorem is needed. The proof also gives invertibility directly by taking .