Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 9 1 iii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Put andFirst suppose . For an interior ball , with , write , , and . Constant shifts of a divergence-form elliptic operator change its forcing. The two nonnegative weak supersolutions and satisfy, respectively,Their Weak Harnack inequalities on therefore have forcing errors bounded by . Indeed , the new divergence forcing is bounded by , and the scalar forcing by ; also .
On we have . Even if , the elementary inequality impliesThe sum of the two essential infima is . Enlarging a uniform constant giveswhere . This is an oscillation decay estimate; inhomogeneous oscillation decay implies Hölder continuity. ChooseIterating on concentric balls, starting at a fixed admissible radius , yieldsThe strict choice of bounds the geometric series, including the case in which the two original decay rates coincide. Monotonicity of oscillation extends this bound to intermediate radii.
Take uniformly smaller than the distance of from the boundary of . The vanishing essential oscillation produces a continuous representative of . A ball centred at either of two sufficiently close points of contains both, so its oscillation bounds their difference by . For separated points use . Thus the Hölder seminorm satisfiesThe constants depend only on the indicated domain separation, dimension, coefficient norms, uniform ellipticity bounds and . If the global essential supremum is infinite, the displayed global estimate is vacuous; local boundedness of weak elliptic subsolutions on slightly larger compact subsets still makes the same argument prove interior Hölder continuity.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 9 1 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Let . The standard local boundedness of weak elliptic subsolutions gives a finite upper bound on every relatively compact ball. In particular, the assumed equality of essential suprema makes finite. Equivalently, when using the maximum principle for an upper-bounded weak subsolution, this preliminary fact is already part of the hypothesis.
Set . Because the divergence-form elliptic operator here annihilates constants, and . The hypothesis says . Cover the compact closure of by finitely many balls whose doubled balls lie in . At least one has essential infimum zero: otherwise the minimum of their finitely many positive lower bounds would be a positive lower bound on . The Weak Harnack inequality with zero forcing now givesConsequently almost everywhere on . If another admissible ball overlaps in an open set, its essential infimum of is also zero, and the same argument makes vanish there. Since a domain is connected, a chain of overlapping interior balls reaches every point of . This propagation of zeros by the weak Harnack inequality proves almost everywhere on , which is the claimed strong maximum principle. Notice why the absence of the terms matters: it is precisely what makes .