Logarithmic divergence Created 2026-10-06 Updated 2026-10-25
A logarithmic divergence grows like a logarithm as a cutoff is removed. For example as . An integrand near zero gives . This behavior distinguishes logarithmic sensitivity to an infrared or ultraviolet cutoff from power-law divergence.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 81 1 f Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Under the bipartite spin rotation, the staggered magnetization becomes the uniform transformed . In the Bogoliubov transformation vacuum ,The quantum depletion of Néel order therefore gives, with the zero modes regulated,Near each zero of , the integrand behaves as , producing a logarithmic divergence. With a finite-size cutoff of order , the depletion grows as . Thus the large- expansion about a state with finite Néel order is not self-consistent in the infinite one-dimensional chain. The divergent expression is not a negative physical magnetization; it signals breakdown of that ordered approximation. It does not determine whether the exact excitation spectrum is gapped.
Past exam of the quantum field theory course of the University of Oxford 2024 3 b Solution 2026-10-25
Let count internal scalar and fermion lines and count independent loops in a connected amputated Feynman diagram. At large loop momentum, the scalar propagator falls as and the Dirac propagator falls as , including its numerator. Each loop integration is . The nonderivative interaction vertices add no powers. ThereforeCount endpoints of each kind of line and use the connected-graph loop order identity:Eliminating givesThe cancellation of reflects their dimensionless couplings; every insertion of the positive-dimensional improves the superficial degree of divergence by one.
The printed exact homogeneity is shorthand for ultraviolet power counting, not an identity for a massive integrated correlation function. For example, even the free amputated scalar two-point vertex obeys , which differs from when . Logarithmic divergences, actual numerator cancellations and ultraviolet subdivergences also require separate treatment.
Past exam of the quantum field theory course of the University of Oxford 2024 3 d Solution 2026-10-25
Set the renormalized to zero. For a six-scalar vertex, b gives , so a new overall logarithmic divergence can only occur in graphs with . With , the line counts become and , hence .
At one loop this forces and : the only candidate is a closed triangle Feynman diagram with two external scalar legs at each vertex. Its numerator at large loop momentum is proportional toThis vanishes for the specified two-component gamma matrices, each of which is traceless. Replacing one leading by the fermion mass or an external momentum lowers the superficial degree of divergence from zero to at most . Thus the apparent logarithm cancels. Graphs with a vertex already have negative overall degree; the pure-scalar one-loop triangle, for instance, has . There is no one-loop ultraviolet subdivergence inside these proper one-loop vertices. ThereforeThe six-point correlation function need not vanish: finite terms are allowed. Nor is it correct to say that all odd gamma-matrix traces vanish in dimensions. In this representation,The cancellation above follows from repeating the same leading loop momentum, not from a false four-dimensional trace rule.
At two loops, , and are possible. A closed fermion box with a scalar line joining two of its vertices leaves six external scalar legs. It has , , and four leading gamma matrices; the one-loop odd-numerator argument no longer applies.
A background-field check demonstrates that its logarithm is actually nonzero. Put with constant . Define the background fermion mass , the background scalar squared mass , and the induced three-leg Yukawa coupling . The two-loop quantum effective potential contains the sunset diagram with two fermion lines and one scalar line. After a Wick rotation, its relevant integral, apart from a nonzero overall combinatorial factor, isHere the dots and gamma-matrix traces are Euclidean. With , , , its numerator is exactlyThe first three terms reduce to products of one-loop tadpole integrals, which have no logarithmic pole near three dimensions in dimensional regularization. The remaining term isFor positive regulator masses, the large-momentum region of has a positive, nonzero logarithmic divergence. One can see this directly by restricting the relative angles and the ratio to compact intervals away from zero: the remaining common radial integral is proportional to . Its proper one-loop subgraphs are ultraviolet convergent.
Finally, the coefficient multiplying containsThe two-loop sextic counterterm in quartic Yukawa theory follows because its coefficient is for a nonzero coupling. Other two-loop vacuum topologies reduce to products of finite-in-dimensional-regularization tadpoles and do not cancel this logarithmic pole. ThusA sextic counterterm is required even if the renormalized sextic coupling is set to zero at a chosen renormalization scale. A theory constrained to at every scale lacks counterterm closure when . The decoupled exception is the three-dimensional scalar quartic interaction, which needs no sextic counterterm by power counting.