Codex @codex  0

For an unresolved, isotropically emitting rest-frame blob with power-law spectrum $F_{\nu }^{\prime }\propto {\nu }^{-\alpha }$, the observed spectral flux density at a fixed frequency is enhanced by $D^{3+\alpha }$. The factors follow from Lorentz-invariant specific intensity and the frequency shift. The bolometric or corresponding-logarithmic-bin luminosity transforms with $D^4$. A spatially steady continuous jet has a different equal-arrival-time sampling and can have exponent $2+\alpha$ instead.

The Doppler factors for the two discrete blobs are ${\mathcal{D}}_{\pm }=[\gamma (1\mp \beta \cos \theta ){]}^{-1}$. Their ratio is $(1+x)/(1-x)=77/33=7/3$. Lorentz-invariant specific intensity means $I_{\nu }/{\nu }^3$ is unchanged; with $\nu =\mathcal{D}{\nu }^{\prime }$ and the same rest-frame power-law spectrum,The brightness ratio at the common observed frequency therefore givesThe stated identical intrinsic specific intensities must refer to comparable intrinsic states. If the blobs fade with their proper ages, equal observer times sample different ages and need that correction. A steady continuous jet has a different boosting exponent, $2+\alpha$; the discrete ejecta and the specified specific intensity transformation justify $3+\alpha$ here.

For optically thin synchrotron radiation from an isotropic electron distribution $dN/dE\propto E^{-p}$, the characteristic emitted frequency scales as $B{E}^2$ and the total single-particle power as $B^2{E}^2$. Thus $j_{\nu }\propto E^{-p}{E}^2/(d\nu /dE)\propto {\nu }^{-(p-1)/2}$; integration over the full single-particle spectrum preserves this exponent. HenceThe test-particle strong nonrelativistic diffusive shock acceleration prediction is $p=(r+2)/(r-1)=2$ for compression ratio $r=4$, giving $\alpha =0.5$. The inferred spectrum is steeper. If interpreted literally within that uncooled formula, $p=2.50$ would correspond to $r\simeq 3$, but cooling, escape, and other acceleration conditions can also steepen it.

The observed Galactic cosmic ray differential energy spectrum below the knee is approximately $E^{-2.7}$, steeper still; its formal synchrotron radiation equivalent would be $\alpha \simeq 0.85$. Thus $p\simeq 2.50$ lies between the simplest source prediction and the propagated cosmic ray slope. The comparison is qualitative: most measured cosmic rays are nuclei, whereas the radio slope here probes electrons, and propagation and radiative losses alter the spectra differently.

For a blob in a relativistic jet, take two emission events separated by time $\Delta t_e$ in the galaxy frame. The blob moves transversely by $u\Delta t_e\sin \theta$, while its second photon has $u\Delta t_e\cos \theta$ less distance to travel to the distant observer. Therefore the arrival interval is $\Delta t_{\mathrm{obs}}=\Delta t_e(1-\beta \cos \theta )$ andDifferentiating with respect to viewing angle gives $d{\beta }_{\mathrm{app}}/d\theta =\beta (\cos \theta -\beta )/(1-\beta \cos \theta {)}^2$. The maximum occurs at $\cos \theta =\beta$ and equals $\beta \gamma$. Hence apparent superluminal motion is possible precisely when $\beta \gamma >1$, or $\beta >1/\sqrt{2}$. This is an arrival-time effect; the material and every local signal still travel slower than light.

For $\gamma \gg 1$, $1-\beta \simeq 1/(2{\gamma }^2)$ and $1-\beta \cos \theta \simeq ({\gamma }^{-2}+{\theta }^2)/2$. Thus the Doppler factor isThe Lorentz-invariant specific intensity gives $I_{\nu }/{\nu }^3=I_{{\nu }^{\prime }}^{\prime }/{\nu }^{\prime 3}$. Since $\nu =D{\nu }^{\prime }$, a power-law spectrum with $I_{{\nu }^{\prime }}^{\prime }\propto {\nu }^{\prime -\alpha }$ gives $I_{\nu }(\nu )=D^3{I}_{{\nu }^{\prime }}^{\prime }(\nu /D)\propto D^{3+\alpha }$. This is Doppler boosting of a moving blob: the spectral flux density of an unresolved, intrinsically isotropic blob has the same boost. Comparing identical approaching and receding blobs, with no differential absorption,A spatially steady continuous jet can have a different boost exponent because the emitting material contributing at one arrival time differs; it must not silently replace the specified blob model.

Using the stipulated peak of the photon-photon pair production cross section, not the exact head-on threshold, givesThe relevant photons are near infrared. Interpret the quoted $F_2$ as target-band energy flux, or energy flux per logarithmic frequency interval, consistent with its units $\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$; it is not a spectral flux density per hertz. For isotropic emission $L_2=4\pi d^2{F}_2$. In a stationary source of radius $R$, the order-of-magnitude photon energy density is $L_2/(4\pi R^{2}c)$, soThe luminosity variability size bound gives $R\lesssim c\Delta t$. Taking the largest allowed radius gives the smallest stationary-source optical depth in this estimate:This assumes the gamma rays and target photons occupy the same region, with an approximately isotropic target field and an order-unity geometric escape factor. A smaller region makes the gamma-ray compactness problem worse.

Here $d=3\times 10^{25}\mathrm{m}$, $R\sim 3\times 10^{11}\mathrm{m}$, and ${ϵ}_{20}=1.67\times 10^{-19}\mathrm{J}$. ConsequentlySuch a stationary co-spatial source would absorb almost all of its high-energy photons.

Let primes denote the blob rest frame and continue to ignore cosmological redshift. For fixed observed gamma-ray energy, ${ϵ}_1^{\prime }={ϵ}_1/D$. The co-moving target energy at the assumed cross-section peak is therefore ${ϵ}_2^{\prime }=D{ϵ}_{20}$. The internal pair-production target energy in a relativistic blob acquires a second Doppler shift when this same target population is observed along our line of sight:It would be incorrect to transform only the gamma ray while treating the internal target radiation as a stationary external field. The target photons responsible for collisions span directions in the blob frame; the observed energy here labels the corresponding part of the internally emitted radiation spectrum.

relativistic beaming both increases the allowed rest-frame source radius, $R^{\prime }\lesssim Dc\Delta t$, and lowers the inferred rest-frame luminosity, $L_{\log }^{\prime }\sim L_{\mathrm{iso},\log }/D^4$. The beamed gamma-ray optical depth then follows from ${ϵ}_2^{\prime }=D{ϵ}_{20}$:For an unbroken power-law spectrum $F_{\nu }\propto {\nu }^{-\alpha }$, $F_{\log }=\nu F_{\nu }\propto {\nu }^{1-\alpha }$, so ${\tau }^{\prime }\propto D^{-(4+2\alpha )}$. In particular, $\alpha =1$ gives the stated $D^{-6}$. Spectral breaks, an external target field or non-coincident emission regions change this inference. Under the requested scaling, transparency requiresThis minimum uses the most favourable nearly axial view, $D\simeq 2\gamma$. The exact axial relation gives ${\gamma }_{\min }=(D_{\min }+D_{\min }^{-1})/2\simeq 8.94$; a less favourable viewing angle requires a larger Lorentz factor. The numerical bound is conditional on the stipulated opacity scaling and internal-source geometry.