Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 54 1 a iii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
The useful high-density core bound from TOV compactness follows without choosing the unknown high-density equation of state. Let be the radius at which the decreasing energy density first reaches , and put , . The Tolman–Oppenheimer–Volkoff equation gives away from a nonempty centre; since , energy density decreases outward. HenceFor the local stellar compactness, if , , since its derivative is . Applying the supplied compactness inequality at the core boundary therefore gives . Combining the two bounds yieldsThe pressure-dependent form further restricts the allowed core-boundary data:In particular, positivity of its right side gives , so when . These restrictions depend only on known quantities, not on the equation of state above .
The intended stellar-mass argument now attaches the known low-density envelope to each admissible pair with pressure . Its Tolman–Oppenheimer–Volkoff equation involves only the known equation of state. For a physical low-density envelope with a uniformly bounded mass on this bounded set of core data, taking the supremum of the envelope-plus-core masses gives an upper mass limit independent of any high-density continuation. Stars with are also determined entirely by the known equation of state. Unknown dense-core physics cannot evade the displayed core bounds.
A qualification is necessary for a claim about the entire star: the printed monotonicity assumptions alone do not guarantee a finite maximum total mass for an arbitrary known low-density equation of state. An explicit low-density polytropic mass divergence occurs for with fixed . In the low-density Newtonian limit, this is a stellar polytrope of index , whose Lane-Emden equation has a finite first zero. With and , hydrostatic balance fixeswhere is the dimensionless Lane-Emden surface mass constant. Thus as , although . The first Lane-Emden zero is simple. The continuous dependence of an ODE solution on parameters therefore preserves this finite surface for sufficiently small relativistic parameter. The relativistic correction is controlled by , so the corresponding regular finite-radius Tolman–Oppenheimer–Volkoff equation solutions have the same limiting scalings. They never sample , and satisfy the local positivity and monotonicity assumptions in their nonvacuum interiors. This shows exactly why a suitable bounded-envelope hypothesis, or an appropriate restriction to physically stable stellar models, must accompany the intended total-mass conclusion. The compactness inequality supplies a bound on the unknown core, not a bound on the mass of every conceivable dilute envelope.