Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 iii Paper 6 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let and be rational parabolic subgroups with rational Levi subgroups. Work with complex representations of their finite groups of Lie type. Here Harish-Chandra induction and Harish-Chandra restriction meanThe latter is an -module, and it is adjoint to the former by Frobenius reciprocity.
DefineFor , put and let transport an -module to a -module. The Mackey formula for Harish-Chandra induction is the natural functor isomorphismOn characters the direct sum becomes a sum. The intersection parabolics displayed in the subscripts are important: they specify exactly which Harish-Chandra induction and Harish-Chandra restriction occur.
We use the following parabolic-intersection lemmas, stating explicitly the geometric input to the proof. First, representatives of represent exactly the double cosets . Second, for such , the groups and are parabolic subgroups of and , respectively, with common Levi subgroup and respective unipotent radicals and . If , projection maps onto with kernel . Projection maps onto with kernel . These assertions hold on rational points as well. The surjectivity on rational points uses connectedness of the unipotent kernels and the Lang theorem for algebraic groups. These are the compatible-Levi and rational double-coset lemmas; they follow by applying the root-subgroup decomposition after choosing the common maximal algebraic torus.
For completeness, the representation-theoretic reduction is as follows. The group algebra realization of induced representation splits according to the double cosets:as a -bimodule. Tensoring on the right with an inflated -module identifies each summand with induction from . This proves the finite-group Mackey restriction formula in the formHere is trivial on .
We next record the elementary normal-subgroup identity underlying Harish-Chandra restriction. If are finite groups, with a normal subgroup, and , then for a complex -module ,To see this, replace invariants by coinvariants using the averaging idempotent . Taking coinvariants in first replaces by , and forces to act trivially on . Thus it yields ; averaging over identifies this last module with the one displayed. This also shows why characteristic zero makes the argument exact.
Apply this identity to , , . By the intersection lemmas, . Since is trivial on , its -invariants are exactlyMoreover acts trivially on this module, so induction from to is precisely Harish-Chandra induction from . Substituting into each double-coset summand gives the boxed formula. This proves the formula for rational parabolics; it does not assume a general Mackey formula for nonrational Deligne-Lusztig induction.