Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 17 2 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The chain map identity gives, for ,Thus is a chain complex; it is a sign convention for the algebraic mapping cone.
Put with differential . Inclusion into the second summand and projection onto the first give a short exact sequence of chain complexesIts connecting homomorphism is particularly explicit. If is a chain cycle, lift it to and take its boundary. The second component is , so the long exact sequence in homology containsIf every vanishes, the exact sequence makes every both injective and surjective. Conversely, if every is an isomorphism, the map has zero image, while has zero image and zero kernel; hence .
One can also see the converse directly on chain cycles. If is a chain cycle, then and . Injectivity of the induced map on homology gives . Subtracting the chain boundary leaves with . Surjectivity of the induced map on homology lets us choose a chain cycle and such thatThen . Thus every chain cycle in is a chain boundary, proving the mapping cone acyclicity criterion:
Let be a chain map between degreewise finitely generated free abelian groups. If its reduction modulo every prime number is a quasi-isomorphism, the mapping cone acyclicity criterion makes acyclic. The short exact sequence of chain complexes implies that multiplication by is an isomorphism on every . These are finitely generated abelian groups. Their free summands would make multiplication by fail to be surjective, and any nonzero finite summand would make it fail to be injective for a prime dividing its order. Thus and is a quasi-isomorphism. Degreewise finite generation is essential to this argument.