Use the current convention in the question, whose vertex prefactor is . The neutral-current vector and axial couplings are then
For a charged lepton, , , giving
For an active neutrino, , , so . The right-handed weak singlet contribution is purely vectorlike in the charge term; combining it with the left-handed contribution gives precisely this Dirac-current form. These coefficients would be halved if the vertex prefactor were instead.
Let be the Z boson momentum and the outgoing massless lepton momenta. The decay amplitude is
Use the fermion spin sums and . Anticommutation of with the Dirac gamma matrices gives the symmetric part of the trace,
The vector-axial cross term is antisymmetric in , and hence drops out of the massive vector polarization sum. The massless equations also give : in the symmetric part, the first two contractions sum to , canceling the last; the antisymmetric term vanishes because . The longitudinal term therefore makes no contribution.
Since , contraction with gives . Thus the massless fermion Z decay spin sum, including all three initial polarizations, is
To use this fully summed expression for the decay width of one unpolarized Z boson, apply the massive-vector spin average, dividing by three. The width of each fixed polarization is the same after integration over all directions, so that procedure also gives the physical single-particle width. Omitting the division would sum the widths of three initial states.
For two massless distinguishable final particles, the two-body Lorentz-invariant phase space is
Consequently
The tree-level electroweak symmetry breaking relation is . Combining it with the Fermi constant normalization gives
For an active neutrino, the vertex itself projects out inactive chiralities, so no additional helicity factor is needed. This is the tree-level massless leptonic Z decay width; lepton masses and radiative corrections have been excluded.
Use the source convention , with electric charge measured in units of the positron charge. Expanding the covariant derivative in the fermion kinetic term gives interaction . Substituting the given neutral-field rotation, the coefficient of is
The photon coefficient is , with . For a Dirac field, acts only on its left-handed component. Thus
The weak neutral current interaction consequently has the requested form, with
The electroweak representation and hypercharge table gives the following values for one generation:
Type on left
Neutrinoabsent
Charged lepton
Up-type quark
Down-type quark
These neutral-current vector and axial couplings use the source's vertex prefactor . They are twice the coefficients used with prefactor ; the latter convention must not be mixed into this calculation. For the neutrino, the chiral projector removes the inactive right-handed component automatically.
Set and suppress the species label. For outgoing momenta , the amplitude is, up to an irrelevant phase,
The final-state spin sum is the Dirac trace of . Anticommutation of with the gamma matrices makes its symmetric part
The vector-axial cross term is proportional to the antisymmetric Levi-Civita symbol, so it contracts to zero with the symmetric massive vector polarization sum . Since , the symmetric tensor is transverse to as well. Only remains, and
Multiplying by proves the massless fermion Z decay spin sum:
For the decay width, average over the three initial polarizations. Rotational invariance makes the integrated width the same for each initial spin state, so the massive-vector spin average is legitimate even for a single prepared polarization. In the rest frame, the delta functions in two-body Lorentz-invariant phase space leave
This follows by setting and integrating ; the radial integration supplies a factor . Hence
For a quark species multiply by three colors, with strong-interaction radiative corrections when comparing with data. For one effectively massless active neutrino, , so .
The total resonance width contains visible charged-lepton and hadron decays plus . Thus the measured invisible contribution determines
Early resonance measurements supported three light active neutrino species, with experimental uncertainties; the OPAL analysis of its 1989 data explicitly compares the three- and four-species predictions. Under the question's assumption that every possible family has a massless neutrino with ordinary weak couplings, this constrains the number of such families. The inference does not exclude additional neutrinos heavier than or gauge singlet sterile states with no ordinary coupling. This is light-neutrino counting from the Z width.