In the terminology of a minimal primary decomposition, an associated prime of a primary decomposition of is a prime ideal occurring as in such a decomposition. The first uniqueness theorem for primary decomposition says that this collection is independent of the chosen minimal primary decomposition. Among these prime ideals, an isolated prime of a primary decomposition is minimal under inclusion, equivalently a minimal prime over an ideal ; an embedded prime ideal strictly contains another member of the collection. Thus
When is a Noetherian ring, these are precisely the associated primes of a module . In that case the equivalent definition is
where is a colon ideal. The decomposition terminology applies when a minimal primary decomposition exists; a general ring need not provide one for every ideal.
The prime radical of a noncommutative ring is , with ranging over all prime ideals of a noncommutative ring. Here primeness means that for two-sided ideals , implies or . A minimal prime over an ideal is a prime ideal containing with no strictly smaller prime ideal containing .
The ascending chain condition on left ideals also applies to two-sided ideals. We first prove by Noetherian induction that every proper contains a finite product of prime ideals, each containing . If there were counterexamples, choose a maximal one. It is not prime, so there are strictly larger two-sided ideals with . Neither is a counterexample; products of prime ideals contained in and in then concatenate to a product contained in , a contradiction.
Write . Every prime ideal over contains at least one , by primeness. The inclusion-minimal members of the finite list are therefore precisely the minimal primes over an ideal : any smaller prime over would contain a member of that same list. Consequently there are finitely many. Replacing each factor by a minimal prime contained in it gives
with each minimal over . Repeated factors may be necessary; in the sole minimal prime requires its th power to reach zero.
Apply this to . Since for every ,
Thus the prime radical is a nilpotent ideal, as in finite minimal primes and nilpotent prime radical.
Now assume is commutative. A prime ideal is an associated prime of a module when for some . Every nonzero module over has an associated prime: the ascending chain condition gives a maximal annihilator of a nonzero element, and maximal annihilator of a module element is prime.
Since the given is a Noetherian module, repeatedly choosing such a cyclic submodule in the next quotient yields a finite prime filtration
The process terminates by the ascending chain condition. In a short exact sequence , one has . Indeed, if and , the image of in still has annihilator . Otherwise choose ; then , and primeness gives . As , induction along the prime filtration proves
In particular there are only finitely many associated primes of a module.
Finally let be a minimal prime ideal of . Its localization at a prime ideal has exactly one prime, its maximal ideal . The preceding nilpotence result makes this maximal ideal nilpotent. Choose annihilated by , for example a nonzero element in its last nonzero power, or if . Since elements outside the maximal ideal are units, .
Write . The element is nonzero and also has annihilator . Generate by . For each , choose with , and put . Then remains nonzero after localization, while . If , localization forces , and hence . Therefore . This proves that minimal primes are associated primes.
In , the ideal has radical of an ideal , a prime ideal, and hence a unique minimal prime ideal. Nevertheless , , and for all , so is not a primary ideal. The same example works after adjoining inverses of and ; thus it also gives an example in a two-variable Laurent polynomial ring.