Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 iii Paper 29 2 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A Non-Archimedean absolute value on a field is a function with exactly for , , and the ultrametric inequality . It is nontrivial if some nonzero element has value different from one. Equivalent absolute values induce the same topology; for nontrivial absolute values this is equivalent to for some .
Here is also a proof of the latter equivalence in the case needed. A positive power plainly preserves the open neighborhoods of zero. Conversely, if the topologies coincide, then if and only if in the first topology, hence if and only if . Choose with . For every , and , whether agrees for the two values. Comparison with all rational numbers therefore identifies the two ratios . Thus with .
Now let be nontrivial and non-Archimedean on . Since and every positive integer is a sum of ones, for every integer. If all nonzero integers had value one, multiplicativity would make the absolute value trivial on all rationals. Hence some integer has value less than one; its prime factorization shows that some prime has .
There cannot be two distinct such primes . A Bezout identity with would giveThus every other prime has value one. Prime factorization of the numerator and denominator of now givesConversely is multiplicative and satisfies the ultrametric inequality, since . Distinct primes give inequivalent values: for the -adic absolute value but for . We have proved the non-Archimedean part of Ostrowski theorem:There is exactly one equivalence class for each prime.