Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 55 2 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
In the Spatially flat FLRW metric, neglect metric perturbations and write . The kinetic invariant is then exactly quadratic in field derivatives:Subtracting gives the second-order expansionIn the derivative-dominated approximation, with treated as slowly varying. Thus andThis uses the linear flat-to-comoving slicing relation. Differentiating its slowly varying coefficient would add terms involving undifferentiated ; it is not an exact nonlinear gauge transformation, and those neglected terms do not alter the leading pure coefficient computed here.
Only and contribute to the requested three-time-derivative term. Therefore the directly evaluated cubic coefficient isThis is the derivative-cubic coefficient of a noncanonical scalar. For a physical scalar field theory, differentiating at fixed gives . Its sound speed is consequentlyThe minus sign printed in the denominator of reverses the asserted coefficient identity; it must be a plus. The printed background equation also lacks a power: it is in the stated reduced-Planck units. A stable propagating scalar has positive time-kinetic coefficient and positive gradient coefficient , as summarized by noncanonical scalar kinetic stability.
The unfactored expression for stays meaningful if , although separately then need not exist. For a canonical kinetic term with no higher kinetic derivatives, . The cubic curvature action for a P(X, phi) scalar field can include other vertices and gravitational terms; they are outside this requested derivative coefficient.