In the ideal state-selective fluorescence detection model, driving the optical transition produces a bright record only for , while is dark. A sufficiently discriminating pulse therefore measures the basis . The optical cycle is assumed to return population to the appropriate logical state without leakage. Ignoring the recorded outcome removes the off-diagonal quantum coherence between and .
Take equally spaced measurements at , including the final time. Between checks the resonant drive rotates through angle . The probability of changing basis state in one interval is
After each ideal projective measurement, the populations therefore follow the symmetric two-state Markov chain
The population difference is multiplied by at each step. Starting in , the nonselective two-level Zeno dynamics gives
For , the exact final population is , while the requested large- estimate is , about four percent. Thus the transition that an uninterrupted pi pulse would complete is strongly inhibited.
If “leaving” instead means departing from at least once in the complete measurement record, use the repeated projective-measurement survival probability. The probability that every check returns is
It has the same leading estimate , but is not exactly the final population: a trajectory can leave and subsequently return. Keeping these events separate also distinguishes postselected records from an experiment that measures only final populations.
Figure 1.
Rabi transfer inhibited by repeated measurements, with final population and all-check departure distinguished
. Original ideal two-level calculations, not historical data. Probe times include the end of the pi pulse. The first panel shows ensemble populations between nonselective probes; the second compares exact final population, departure at any recorded check, and their common large-n estimate. Details.
The mechanism is the quadratic short-time quantum survival probability: each short interval has transition probability of order , so checks leave only an order- total transition probability. The quantum Zeno effect here requires effective, sufficiently fast measurements; a finite-duration optical probe is a physical interaction whose imperfections must be included when comparing with data.
The beryllium-ion quantum Zeno experiment of 1990 used the same ground-state transition and a finite-duration optical probing sequence, followed by a calibrated ensemble fluorescence readout. Its measured final populations motivate the nonselective model; the instantaneous projections here idealize those physical pulses.