Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 iii Paper 10 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
The general modular form, the nonuniform Frankl-Wilson theorem, can be stated as follows. Let be a prime number, and let have elements. Suppose has for every member, while for any distinct members. ThenThe uniform Frankl-Wilson theorem sharpens this to when all members have size and . Both forms require a prime modulus and exclusion of the self-intersection residue.
For the general proof, work over the finite field . Associate to each member the intersection polynomialAt the characteristic vectors of sets , this is zero if , and nonzero if . Thus these polynomials, regarded as functions on the Boolean hypercube, are linearly independent: evaluating any relation at isolates its coefficient. Apply multilinear reduction on the Boolean cube, replacing every positive power of a variable by that variable. Values on the Boolean hypercube remain unchanged, and the resulting multilinear polynomials have degree at most . Their ambient space has a monomial basis consisting of for , with dimension . This proves the general bound, including .
For completeness, obtain the uniform sharpening without dividing by factorials in a finite field. For put and . The functions with are linearly independent. Indeed, a relation gives with , so is supported only on weights in . With boundary weights , this set has a gap of at least : either consecutive allowed weights differ by , or its terminal gap does, since . The alternating sum of over any interval of free coordinates vanishes by its degree. Across that gap only one endpoint level can contribute, forcing to vanish there. Delete that level and repeat across the enlarged gap until is empty. Hence , and independence of the square-free monomials gives the claim. Adjoin these functions to the . Evaluation at each family vector eliminates the coefficients of , since vanishes there; the claim eliminates all remaining coefficients. Counting dimensions yieldsThe case permits at most one member directly. The gap argument is an instance of the modular layer vanishing lemma.
For the final application, enumerate the distinct sets as and let be their characteristic vectors of sets. If , the desired bound is immediate for . Otherwise , because intersects another member in points. At most one member can have size : two distinct -sets cannot have intersection size . The Gram matrix of these vectors isFor real coefficients ,All terms are nonnegative, with . If the expression vanishes, every coefficient corresponding to a set of size greater than is zero. At most one coefficient remains, and the first term forces it to be zero as well. Thus the characteristic vectors of sets are linearly independent in , proving the constant-intersection family boundThis proof explicitly covers the possible member of size exactly ; assuming all diagonal corrections were strictly positive would miss that case. Positivity of is essential: when , the empty set and all singleton sets give members.