Let be a prime number, let have elements, and suppose satisfies for distinct members while . The Frankl-Wilson theorem gives
Its polynomial method in combinatorics turns modular intersection restrictions into linearly independent functions represented by square-free monomials of degree .
For a prime number , the vertices are -subsets of . An independent set avoids the only off-diagonal intersection congruent to modulo , so the Frankl-Wilson theorem bounds its size by . A clique has constant intersection and has size at most , by the same theorem modulo a prime larger than . This explicit graph gives an asymmetric Ramsey number lower bound and an exponential chromatic number lower bound.
If member sizes modulo a prime number avoid while distinct intersections lie in , evaluation at characteristic vectors of sets gives a diagonal matrix with nonzero diagonal. After multilinear reduction on the Boolean cube, these polynomials remain linearly independent and have degree at most . Counting square-free monomials proves . On a fixed uniform layer, the low-degree evaluation rank on a uniform layer sharpens this to when does not exceed the layer rank.
For a prime , take rank- subsets of with no distinct pair meeting in points. Split by membership of coordinate one. In the containing part, remove that coordinate; in the avoiding part, first take complements and then remove it. Both transformed families have rank on points. Their distinct intersections avoid residue modulo . The uniform Frankl-Wilson theorem bounds each by , yielding the displayed stronger form of the requested bound.
Fix a -set . Take every -set with a -subset of the remaining points, together with the complements of all these sets. Within either half, intersections have size at least . Across the halves they have size . Thus no intersection has size , and the two disjoint halves give the displayed family size.
Let and let an -uniform set family have no distinct pair whose intersection is congruent to modulo . Its size is bounded as displayed; the customary nontrivial form requires . The Lucas theorem makes a residue detector modulo , equal to one exactly when . Its Boolean evaluation functions have degree at most and a diagonal evaluation matrix on the family. The low-degree evaluation rank on a uniform layer supplies the sharp dimension bound. Without the size qualification, three singletons with contradict the customary printed form, since .
In the polynomial method in combinatorics, a set family of sets with common size residue modulo a prime number annihilates the displayed auxiliary functions. After multilinear reduction on the Boolean cube, functions with have degree at most . If avoids every modulo , these functions are linearly independent: evaluation at a set gives , and increasing eliminates coefficients. Combining them with diagonal intersection polynomials removes the lower-degree monomial count and strengthens the dimension bound from to .
Let be a prime number, , , and . A multilinear polynomial over of degree less than that vanishes on every Boolean vertex whose weight is not congruent to modulo vanishes everywhere. Alternating sums over intervals of free coordinates eliminate the possible nonzero weight levels one at a time. This proves independence of the auxiliary functions used for the uniform Frankl-Wilson theorem bound.
Let be a prime number and have elements. A set family whose member sizes modulo avoid , and whose distinct pairwise intersection sizes modulo belong to , has at most members. The intersection polynomials have a diagonal, nonzero evaluation matrix on the family's characteristic vectors of sets. Multilinear reduction on the Boolean cube places these linearly independent functions in the space spanned by square-free monomials of degree at most .
If a -uniform set family on an -element ground set has at most possible intersection sizes between distinct members, then its size is at most . The proof uses the linear independence of incidence polynomials on the -slice.

Ancestors (5)

  1. Extremal set theory
  2. Combinatorics
  3. Area of mathematics
  4. Mathematics
  5. Home

Discussion (0)

New discussion

There are no discussions about this article yet.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.