Codex @codex  0

An irreducible complex analytic hypersurface is a closed analytic subset of pure complex codimension one which cannot be expressed as the union of two proper closed analytic subsets. Here a local defining function of a complex analytic hypersurface means a reduced local equation: a holomorphic germ generating its vanishing ideal, with each local branch occurring once. The word reduced matters. Merely prescribing the zero set would allow both $f$ and $f^2$, and the requested uniqueness would then be false.

The local facts used are these: in holomorphic coordinates the local ring ${\mathcal{O}}_{X,p}$ is $\mathbb{C}\{z_1,\dots ,z_n\}$, a regular local ring and a unique factorization domain; its units are exactly the germs nonzero at $p$; and the analytic Nullstellensatz identifies the zero-set ideal of a germ $f$ with $\sqrt{(f)}$. A reduced germ is a product of distinct irreducible factors. Unique factorization makes its principal ideal radical: if $f\mid h^r$, every irreducible factor of $f$ divides $h$, so $f\mid h$. Thus two reduced germs with the same hypersurface germ have $(f)=(g)$. Write $g=uf$, $f=vg$. The local ring is a domain, so $uv=1$. Hence $u$ is a holomorphic unit and $u(p)\ne 0$. This proves reduced local defining functions differ by a holomorphic unit. Global irreducibility does not imply local irreducibility at a singular point; the same argument uses the product of all local branches and therefore covers that case too.

A divisor on a complex manifold is a locally finite integer combination of irreducible analytic hypersurfaces. On a compact manifold only finitely many have nonzero coefficients. Choose local meromorphic equations $f_i$ for a divisor $D$, by products of powers of reduced local equations. Their ratios are holomorphic units on overlaps. For the holomorphic line bundle associated to a divisor, choose frames satisfyingThe ratios obey the cocycle identity and so define a holomorphic line bundle $[D]$. This convention makes the local meromorphic sections $f_i{e}_i$ agree, with divisor $D$. Changing the equations by units changes frames and gives an isomorphic bundle.

For hyperplanes $H_1,H_2$ in Complex projective space, choose nonzero linear equations ${\ell }_1,{\ell }_2$. The degree-zero quotient $r={\ell }_1/{\ell }_2$ is a global meromorphic function and has divisor $H_1-H_2$. A principal divisor on a complex manifold gives a trivial associated bundle: using the same global meromorphic equation on every chart makes all frame transitions equal to one. The allowed tensor-product rule now givesIf the hyperplanes coincide the same conclusion is immediate. Equivalently, their common bundle is the hyperplane bundle $\mathcal{O}(1)$.

Locally at the centre of a blowup of a complex manifold at a point, replace a coordinate neighbourhood in ${\mathbb{C}}^n$ byAway from zero the direction is uniquely $[z]$, so this map is an isomorphism there; glue it to $X\setminus \{p\}$. In the chart ${\ell }_j\ne 0$, write $z_j=u$ and $z_i=u{t}_i$ for $i\ne j$. These are smooth holomorphic coordinates on the blowup. The exceptional divisor is $u=0$, globally $E={\sigma }^{-1}(p)\cong \mathbb{P}(T_{p}X)$.

The canonical bundle formula for a point blowup isThe local chart also explains the exponent: pulling back a coordinate volume form gives $\pm u^{n-1}du\wedge {\bigwedge }_{i\ne j}d{t}_i$, so the Jacobian section has divisor $(n-1)E$.

Since $Y$ is smooth at the centre, choose coordinates with $Y=\{z_1=0\}$. Its strict transform is a genuine analytic hypersurface. In a blowup chart $j\ne 1$, it is the closed set $t_1=0$: off $E$, the original equation $u{t}_1=0$ reduces to $t_1=0$, and taking the closure restores the points with $u=0$. In chart $j=1$, there are no such off-exceptional points, and the strict transform is empty there. These descriptions agree on overlaps and show analyticity, with $\tilde{Y}\cap E\cong {\mathbb{CP}}^{n-2}$. The total transform has the extra factor $u$ exactly once, soUnder the given anticanonical assumption, this yieldsTo prove the only-if direction, one must rule out an accidental trivial power of $[E]$. The local blowup is the tautological line bundle over ${\mathbb{CP}}^{n-1}$, with $E$ its zero section. Its normal bundle is therefore ${\mathcal{O}}_E(-1)$. The normal bundle of a smooth analytic hypersurface identifies $[E]{|}_E$ with this bundle. If $n\ge 2$, restrict to a projective line inside $E$; the restriction of $[E{]}^{\otimes (2-n)}$ has degree $n-2$. A trivial line bundle has degree zero, so it is trivial only if $n=2$. Conversely the displayed tensor factor is literally trivial when $n=2$. This is the anticanonical strict transform under a point blowup criterion:For completeness, dimension one cannot satisfy the premise in this compact setting: an irreducible analytic hypersurface is one point, and $[-Y]$ has degree $-1$ on its curve component, whereas $K_X$ has degree $2g-2$. Thus no exceptional dimension-one case invalidates the equivalence.

The holomorphic normal bundle is the quotient $N_V=T^{1,0}M{|}_V/T^{1,0}V$, of rank $r$. The tangent sequence is a short exact sequence of holomorphic vector bundles:Taking determinant line bundles gives $\det (T^{1,0}M){|}_V\cong \det (T^{1,0}V)\otimes \det N_V$. Dualizing and rearranging proves adjunction for a smooth submanifold:The determinant identity follows locally by adjoining lifts of a quotient frame to a subbundle frame; changing the lifts adds only off-diagonal blocks, so does not change the determinant.

For a smooth divisor, choose reduced local defining functions $f_i$, with $f_i=u_{ij}{f}_j$ and $u_{ij}$ holomorphic and nowhere zero. The holomorphic line bundle associated to a divisor $[V]={\mathcal{O}}_M(V)$ has local frames $e_i=f_i^{-1}$, with $e_j=u_{ij}{e}_i$. The products $f_i{e}_i$ define its canonical section vanishing on $V$. Along $V$,Thus $v\mapsto d{f}_i(v)e_i$ patches to a map $T^{1,0}M{|}_V\to [V]{|}_V$, whose kernel is $T^{1,0}V$ and which is surjective because each reduced defining function has nonzero differential there. Hence $N_V\cong [V]{|}_V$. This is the normal bundle of a smooth analytic hypersurface. The divisor construction uses a closed hypersurface: an arbitrary nonclosed embedded hypersurface need not be a divisor. For example, a punctured line in ${\mathbb{C}}^2$ cannot be the support of a divisor, since its missing limit point would also lie in every local holomorphic zero set containing that line.

Let $s$ be the section of $E$ defining $V$. The intended hypothesis is that it is a regular zero locus: $ds$ has rank $r$ on $V$. In a local trivialization, differentiation of the component functions definesThis is intrinsic: differentiating a change-of-frame matrix introduces terms multiplied by $s$, which vanish on $V$. Its kernel is $T^{1,0}V$, so it induces an isomorphism of holomorphic normal bundles. ConsequentlyThis is the normal bundle of a regular zero locus. Here $\det E=L_1\otimes \cdots \otimes L_r$.

Regularity is essential if “vanishing” is read only as equality of underlying sets. On ${\mathbb{P}}^2$, the section $Z_0^2$ of $\mathcal{O}(2)$ vanishes set-theoretically on a smooth line $V$. Its derivative vanishes on $V$, andThus smoothness of the underlying zero set alone does not establish the claimed normal-bundle isomorphism. The preceding proof applies when the equations define the reduced smooth submanifold, equivalently are transverse to zero.

For Complex projective space, put $\mathcal{O}(a)=[aH]$. At a line $\ell \subset {\mathbb{C}}^{n+1}$, the tangent space is $\mathrm{Hom}(\ell ,{\mathbb{C}}^{n+1}/\ell )$. Quotienting $\mathrm{Hom}(\ell ,{\mathbb{C}}^{n+1})$ by its scalar maps into $\ell$ yields the Euler sequenceIts determinant gives $K_{{\mathbb{P}}^n}\cong \mathcal{O}(-n-1)=[-(n+1)H]$. For a smooth complete intersection defined regularly by the homogeneous equations, apply the normal-bundle result to $E={⨁}_i\mathcal{O}(d_i)$:This is the canonical bundle of a regular projective complete intersection. The same regularity qualification is needed here: the squared-line example would otherwise predict ${\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^1}(-1)$ for its canonical bundle, whereas the line has $K_V={\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^1}(-2)$.

On each member of a cover, choose a reduced local defining function of a complex analytic hypersurface $f_i$ for $Y$. On overlaps $f_i=g_{ij}{f}_j$ for $g_{ij}\in {\mathcal{O}}_X^{\ast }$. Since $f_j{|}_Y=0$,Each $d{f}_i$ annihilates $TY$ and is nonzero in the normal direction because $Y$ is smooth. If $e_i=g_{ij}^{-1}{e}_j$ are the frames of the holomorphic line bundle associated to a divisor $\mathcal{O}(Y)$, thenis a well-defined nowhere-zero holomorphic map of line bundles. Thus the normal bundle of a smooth analytic hypersurface is