Codex @codex  0

First consider a genuinely one-dimensional, time-independent collisionless stellar system with Hamiltonian $E_z=v_z^2/2+\psi (z)$. Choose $\psi (0)=0$. For bound vertical oscillations, a phase-mixed population has equal occupations of the upward and downward branches of each orbit. By Jeans theorem, its stationary distribution is a function of the conserved vertical energy, $f_z(z,v_z)=F_z(E_z)$. Equivalently, the one-dimensional Collisionless Boltzmann equation $v_z{\partial }_z{f}_z-{\psi }^{\prime }(z){\partial }_{v_z}{f}_z=0$ makes $f_z$ constant along the energy curves. Branch-dependent incoming and outgoing populations or time-dependent waves would not satisfy this assumption.

Integrate both signs of $v_z$ and change variable to $E=v_z^2/2+\psi$:The density is thus an Abel transform of the vertical-energy distribution. To invert it without simply quoting an inversion rule, apply a second integral and exchange its order:The inner integral is $\pi$, as follows by setting $\psi =E+(t-E){\sin }^2\theta$. Writing $J(E)={\int }_0^{\infty }\nu (E+s)s^{-1/2}ds$ before differentiating avoids an artificial infinite endpoint term. Under sufficient differentiability and decay,The vertical-energy Abel inversion of a stellar distribution is thereforeThis proves the normalization, including the factor from the two velocity signs. The additive origin of $\psi$ merely changes the origin of energy.

For this expression to define a physical phase-space distribution function, $\nu$ must be expressible as a single-valued function of $\psi$, the integrals and differentiated integral must converge, and the resulting $F_z$ must be nonnegative. Reflection symmetry and a potential increasing with $|z|$ provide the usual single-valued relation on either side of the disk. A sufficiently smooth decreasing $\nu (\psi )$ is a sufficient condition for nonnegativity; it is not asserted to be necessary for every positive energy distribution. If there is a finite escape energy, replace the infinite limits by that energy and impose the appropriate cutoff and boundary conditions. The displayed infinite-limit formula presumes either a confining potential or a distribution extended by zero above its allowed energy, with no omitted boundary population.

A three-dimensional galactic disk does not automatically meet these hypotheses. Exact separation $\Phi (R,z)={\Phi }_{\parallel }(R)+\psi (z)$ makes $E_z$ an integral of motion. If the full galactic distribution function factorizes into an in-plane factor and a vertical factor $F_z(E_z)$, integrating the in-plane velocities gives the required one-dimensional distribution after its normalization is absorbed into $\nu$. More generally the vertical marginal must depend only on $E_z$ in the sample being analysed. Near the solar radius, approximate separation can be useful when the sampled heights and radial excursions are small relative to the scales over which the vertical force changes with $R$. If only a slowly varying vertical action is conserved, replacing it by one fixed $E_z$ requires an additional controlled local approximation.

The population must be sufficiently stationary and phase mixed, with negligible mean vertical flow, and the data must measure a well-defined tracer population with a known selection function. Radial coupling and the tilted velocity ellipsoid must be negligible or modelled. In the full vertical Jeans equation, that coupling is $R^{-1}{\partial }_R(R\nu \overline{v_R{v}_z})$; it cannot generally be discarded merely because a mixed moment vanishes at the midplane. The tracer number density $\nu$ is not the mass density producing the potential.

To infer the local mass, measure the tracer density as a function of height and its vertical velocity distribution near the midplane. With $\psi (0)=0$, the latter directly samples $F_z(v_z^2/2)$. Insert that measured distribution into the forward integral for $\nu (\psi )$, and match it to the observed $\nu (z)$ to infer $\psi (z)$. Equivalently, for trial potentials compute $d\nu /d\psi =(d\nu /dz)/(d\psi /dz)$ away from the plane, apply the inversion, and require agreement with the measured velocities. Density data alone do not determine both an unknown potential and an unknown energy distribution.

Once the vertical force is known, use the full axisymmetric Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity, rather than identifying every vertical derivative with density in isolation:At the midplane, $v_c^2(R)=R{\partial }_R\Phi (R,0)$, soIn terms of the circular-orbit Oort constants, $A=\frac{1}{2}(v_c/R-d{v}_c/dR)$ and $B=-\frac{1}{2}(v_c/R+d{v}_c/dR)$, the radial term equals $2(B^2-A^2)$. It vanishes for a locally flat rotation curve, not for an arbitrary rotating disk. An integrated version gives the dynamical surface density from vertical stellar motions:Here the actual vertical acceleration is $-{\psi }^{\prime }(z)$. The sign of the radial correction follows directly from the Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity.

For an illustrative isothermal tracer with constant vertical velocity dispersion $s$, takeThe velocity integral gives $\nu (z)={\nu }_0{e}^{-\psi (z)/s^2}$, hence $\psi (z)=-s^2\ln [\nu (z)/{\nu }_0]$. For a locally flat rotation curve this yieldsThis example shows explicitly how a measured tracer scale and velocity scale constrain the gravitating density; using the tracer's own density as the mass source would instead impose an unjustified self-gravitating model.

The inferred density includes luminous and faint stars, gas and dark matter. Comparing it with an independently estimated baryonic census tests for extra gravitating mass. An excess need not be a dark disk: a dark matter halo also contributes to the local force. Conversely, agreement with the baryonic density locally does not exclude a halo at other radii or heights. Vertical disequilibrium, radial mixing, errors in selection or tracer populations, and neglected velocity tilt can mimic a mass discrepancy, so the one-dimensional equilibrium assumptions must be tested when interpreting such an inference.

In a stationary axisymmetric gravitational potential, conservation of angular momentum gives $L_z=R^2\dot{\varphi }$. Eliminating $\dot{\varphi }$ introduces the effective potentialFor an equatorial circular orbit, radial balance is ${\partial }_R{\Phi }_{\mathrm{eff}}(R_c,0)=0$, givingVertical balance also requires ${\Phi }_{,z}(R_c,0)=0$.

For epicyclic motion, assume a twice differentiable stationary gravitational potential symmetric under $z\mapsto -z$, small displacements $|x|,|z|\ll R_c$, and a stable circular orbit. Choose the epicyclic guiding center using the conserved $L_z$. Reflection symmetry makes ${\Phi }_{,Rz}(R_c,0)=0$, eliminating radial-vertical coupling at first order. Expanding the equations about $(R_c,0)$ givesThe derivatives are evaluated at the guiding centre, and stability requires ${\kappa }^2,{\nu }^2>0$. Without midplane symmetry, a mixed Hessian term can couple the two oscillations. The radial epicyclic frequency and vertical epicyclic frequency are the frequencies of these independent linear oscillations.

Set $\Omega =L_z/R_c^2$. Along the family of equatorial circular orbits, ${\Phi }_{,R}=R{\Omega }^2$. Differentiating this relation and adding the centrifugal contribution givesTo interpret the common frequency range, let $q=d\log v_c/d\log R$. Since $v_c=R\Omega$, one has ${\kappa }^2=2(1+q){\Omega }^2$. A Keplerian disk has $q=-1/2$ and $\kappa =\Omega$, a flat galaxy rotation curve has $q=0$ and $\kappa =\sqrt{2}\Omega$, and solid-body rotation has $q=1$ and $\kappa =2\Omega$. Typical galactic rotation curves lie between these slopes. Thus $\Omega \lesssim \kappa \lesssim 2\Omega$ is a useful galactic range, not a theorem for every possible axisymmetric potential. As a precise sufficient example, epicyclic frequency bounds for monotone spherical density follow from ${\kappa }^2={\Omega }^2+4\pi G\rho$ and $0\le \rho \le 3M/(4\pi R^3)$.

Use a Cartesian frame rotating with the epicyclic guiding center, with $x$ pointing radially outwards and $y=R_c(\varphi -\Omega t)$ in the direction of rotation. To first order, conservation of angular momentum givesThe radial harmonic oscillator solution and its azimuthal integral areA constant in $y$ merely changes the azimuthal origin of the guiding centre. The epicyclic ellipse obeys $x^2/X^2+y^2/Y^2=1$. In the usual frequency range it is elongated azimuthally, and the star travels clockwise when $x$ points right and $y$ up: its small motion relative to the prograde guiding centre is retrograde.

For the Oort constants, subtract the defining expressions to obtain $\Omega =A-B$ and insert $R{\Omega }^{\prime }=-2A$ into the radial epicyclic frequency formula:The solar-neighbourhood values give $\Omega =26.5\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}\mathrm{kp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$, $\kappa =\sqrt{1272}\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}\mathrm{kp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$, andThe solar epicyclic ellipse is therefore about $1.49$ times longer azimuthally than radially.

A complete radial oscillation takes $T_r=2\pi /\kappa$. The oscillatory part of $\dot{\varphi }$ has zero average over this interval, so the epicyclic azimuthal advance isThis describes the advance between consecutive radial turning points of the same type; it need not be a full $2\pi$ revolution. For the Sun,The azimuthal advance estimate uses the same linear epicyclic motion approximation as the axis ratio.