Choose positive tilt towards , so the rod tangent is and its normal is . The opposite angular convention reverses the signed phase optimum later. In resistive-force theory, a point with centred arclength has velocity , and its force on the fluid is , where . The force on the rod has the opposite sign.
The pure centred rotational contribution is odd in and therefore gives zero net force instantaneously in either direction. In the combined oscillating rigid rod in resistive-force theory, however, orientation modulates the translational force. After half a period, and . Reflection in the axis takes one configuration and its forcing into the other. A force component in reverses under this reflection, whereas a component in does not. Explicitly,
The first is half-period antisymmetric and the second is half-period symmetric. Hence , while symmetry permits . The possible mean force comes from the coupled translation and rotation, not from pure centred rotation alone.
In the oscillating rigid rod in resistive-force theory, and . Since
the mean transverse force from a rocking rod, on the fluid in the tilt convention of part (a), is
The parallel and perpendicular drag coefficients of a slender filament are per unit length here. Their difference is essential: isotropic local drag gives zero transverse force. The hydrodynamic force on the rod is the negative of the displayed answer.
The instantaneous work on the fluid equals the integral of . For the oscillating rigid rod in resistive-force theory, and . Odd terms in integrate to zero, giving
Thus the leading power of a rocking rod is
Both terms are quadratic in . Small angle does not make rotation a higher-order contribution: points away from the centre have rotational speed , just as the translational speed is . Their ratio is , controlled by geometry rather than by .