If is reduced, its nilradical is zero. By b, every localization at a prime ideal has zero nilradical, so in particular is reduced for every maximal ideal .
Conversely, suppose every such localization is reduced. Take a nilpotent element . Then is nilpotent in every , hence zero there. To see directly that , suppose otherwise and consider the proper annihilator
Choose a maximal ideal containing this annihilator. The equality in would imply for some , by the vanishing criterion in a module localization. But then , a contradiction. This is the principle that localization detects zero elements. Therefore
The argument also includes the zero ring, which is reduced and has no maximal ideals.
Let be the nilradical of . By b, the reduced locus of a ring is
The Noetherian ring hypothesis makes the ideal finitely generated; write . Fix . For every , the vanishing criterion in a module localization gives with . The product lies outside the prime ideal and satisfies . When , take .
For every prime ideal in the distinguished open set
the element is a unit in . The equality therefore implies , so is reduced. Thus , proving that is a Zariski-open subset of the spectrum of a ring.
More precisely, let , the annihilator of a module . The argument shows that if and only if some lies outside . Hence
Equivalently, the complement is the support of a module . This is vanishing of a finitely generated module near a prime applied to : its finite generation lets the separately chosen denominators be combined into one element annihilating all of .