No. Perfect discrimination of pure states requires orthogonality, whereas
To see the obstruction directly for a basic measurement, let be its orthonormal basis. Certain identification would require disjoint sets of possible outcome labels for two different preparations. For every , at least one of and would therefore vanish. Completeness would then give
contradicting the computed overlap. Failure to distinguish just this pair already rules out certain identification of the three-state family.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.