Hall's marriage theorem says that a bipartite graph with parts has a matching saturating if and only if
Necessity follows because the matched neighbours of vertices of are distinct and belong to .
For sufficiency, assume these inequalities. Let be any vertex cover, with and . Every neighbour of must belong to , since otherwise its edge from is uncovered. Therefore , and . The whole part is itself a vertex cover of size . Part (ii) now gives a matching of size exactly , so it saturates .

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.