Let be morphisms of schemes. Start with and satisfying .
For existence, first apply the extension condition for to and , obtaining . Then apply the extension condition for to , obtaining . This solves the problem for . If both are universally closed morphisms, both are quasi-compact morphisms; their composite is a quasi-compact morphism by the allowed stability fact. Part (a)(i) therefore proves that is a universally closed morphism.
For uniqueness, suppose are extensions for . Uniqueness for gives , and uniqueness for , now over this same , gives . If are separated morphisms, their composite is a quasi-separated morphism by the allowed stability fact. Part (a)(ii) proves that is a separated morphism.
Finally, if are proper morphisms, these arguments give both existence and uniqueness. Stability under composition of quasi-compact morphisms, quasi-separated morphisms and locally of finite type gives the other hypotheses of (a)(iii). Consequently

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.