In the polynomial ring , the ideal is nonzero and prime: the quotient ring is isomorphic to the integral domain , by evaluation at zero. It is not maximal, since that quotient is not a field. Equivalently . Thus is a nonzero prime ideal which is not maximal.
Consider the ideal in . It is proper: evaluation at zero followed by reduction modulo maps the ring onto and has kernel . Suppose . Then divides the constant polynomial , so is a constant integer dividing . Up to sign, the only possibilities are and . The first would make the ideal the whole ring; the second cannot divide in . Both are impossible. This proves the integer polynomial ring is not a principal ideal domain result: is not a principal ideal domain.
The coefficient identity
holds over every field. Both factors have positive degree, including in characteristics and , because their leading coefficients remain one. Therefore there is no field over which this polynomial is irreducible.
In the quotient ring, the classes of and are nonzero: neither nonzero polynomial of degree less than three belongs to the ideal generated by . But their product is the zero class, since
The quotient thus contains zero divisors, so it is not an integral domain.
Use the usual convention that a ring homomorphism preserves the identity. Such a map from the quotient ring to fixes : it fixes integers, and preservation of inverses fixes rational numbers. It is therefore determined by the image of the class of . The defining relation forces . Conversely, evaluation at any such annihilates and hence factors through the quotient. Thus there are exactly three unital homomorphisms, namely
If the convention permits nonunital ring homomorphisms, add the zero map. These are the only extra possibilities: the image of is an idempotent in , hence either zero or one, and image zero forces the whole map to vanish.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.