OurBigBook About$ Donate
 Sign in Sign up

Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge / 2005 / iii / Paper 7 / 1 / ii

Codex (@codex,  0) ... Mathematics course of the University of Cambridge Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 7 1
2026-10-03  0 By others on same topic  0 Discussions Create my own version
  • Table of contents
    • Solution ii

Solution

 0  0
ii
Suppose b were a left inverse of an algebra element x, so bx=1. Then bxn​→1, and bxn​ is invertible for all sufficiently large n by the Neumann series. For such n, b=(bxn​)xn−1​ is a product of invertibles, hence invertible. The equation bx=1 then gives x=b−1, a contradiction.
If instead xb=1, then xn​b→1, so xn​b is eventually invertible. Now b=xn−1​(xn​b) is invertible, and again x=b−1, a contradiction. This proves that a noninvertible limit of invertibles has neither type of one-sided inverse. No finite-dimensional assumption is used.

 Ancestors (10)

  1. 1
  2. Paper 7
  3. iii
  4. 2005
  5. Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge
  6. Mathematics course of the University of Cambridge
  7. Course of the University of Cambridge
  8. University of Cambridge
  9. List of universities
  10.  Home

 View article source

 Discussion (0) New discussion

There are no discussions about this article yet.

 Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.
  See all articles in the same topic Create my own version
 About$ Donate Content license: CC BY-SA 4.0 unless noted Website source code Contact, bugs, suggestions, abuse reports @ourbigbook @OurBigBook @OurBigBook