The inverse argument in part (i) proves that the one-sided inclusion in (iii) already implies equality:
Parts (i) and (ii) then make both symmetric and transitive; it is reflexive from the root solution. Therefore is an equivalence relation containing and .
If is any other equivalence relation containing both, a witness gives , and transitivity gives . Hence . Thus (iii) implies the unique-smallest assertion in (iv).

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.