Lagrange's theorem says that for a subgroup of a finite group ,
To prove it, the left cosets partition . Indeed every element lies in its own coset; if and intersect, write and deduce , so . Multiplication by is a bijection from to , and each coset therefore has elements. Summing over the distinct cosets proves the formula.
For the failure of the converse to Lagrange's theorem, take the alternating group , of order , and the divisor . Suppose it had a subgroup of order six. Its index would be two. An index-two subgroup is normal: for , both and are the complement of , while for they are . Hence would be a group of order two.
Every three-cycle in has order three. Its image in the quotient has cube equal to the identity and, since the quotient has order two, must itself be the identity. Thus all three-cycles lie in . There are eight of them: choose the omitted point in four ways and one of two cyclic orders on the other three points. Together with the identity this would give at least nine elements of , contradicting . Therefore has no subgroup of order six, although six divides its order.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.