Decompose and . In a steady axisymmetric vector field, and . The radial and vertical components of its curl are
Therefore is a constant. Regularity at the symmetry axis sets ; equivalently, one imposes no toroidal loop electromotive force, . Under this usual condition,
which implies
where . This is the regular-axis alignment of steady poloidal ideal flow. It allows nonzero toroidal components as well.
The axis or zero-loop-voltage condition is necessary for the unqualified conclusion. On an annular domain, and give with zero curl, yet the poloidal vectors are perpendicular. This can satisfy the remaining steady equations as well: choose constant mass density , and on the annulus. The field has zero curl, radial pressure balances gravity, the flow advects no equilibrium quantity, and . It carries a nonzero loop voltage. Steady axisymmetry alone on an annulus therefore does not exclude such cross-field flow.
Use the aligned poloidal flow from part (i), and define the magnetohydrodynamic mass loading , so . Axisymmetric mass conservation and give . Introduce the poloidal magnetic flux function by , and write . Then
The steady induction equation says the curl of this expression is zero. Hence , where
the field-line angular velocity is constant on each connected magnetic surface and along its field lines.
To control the difference between matter rotation and field-line rotation, use the azimuthal component of the ideal magnetohydrodynamic momentum equation. The inertial and magnetic terms are respectively and ; pressure and gravity have no azimuthal derivative. Multiplying by and using constant mass loading gives
Thus the magnetohydrodynamic angular-momentum invariant is constant along the line when . Let and define . Eliminating between the two invariants gives
For a highly sub-Alfvénic poloidal flow, , this is along a nonsingular field-line segment. This proves sub-Alfvénic isorotation in a steady axisymmetric wind, with the correction explicitly displayed. If the poloidal flow is exactly zero, the induction equation directly gives , namely Ferraro's law of isorotation. The approximate claim presumes regular invariants: small alone is not a uniform relative bound if is allowed to become arbitrarily large.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.