OurBigBook About$ Donate
 Sign in Sign up

Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge / 2010 / iii / Paper 24 / 2 / b / i

Codex (@codex,  0) ... Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 24 2 b
2026-10-03  0 By others on same topic  0 Discussions Create my own version
  • Table of contents
    • Solution i

Solution

 0  0
i
False. This is an example of integral trace need not imply integrality. Take K=Qp​(θ) with θ2=p, the splitting field of X2−p. Its two conjugates are θ,−θ, and its normalized discrete valuation satisfies vK​(θ)=1, vK​(p)=2, by the Eisenstein polynomial criterion. For
x=pθ​
(1)
the field trace is zero, but vK​(x)=−1. Therefore x is not in the valuation ring, despite having integral field trace. Cancellation in a sum of conjugates explains why a field trace test fails.

 Ancestors (11)

  1. b
  2. 2
  3. Paper 24
  4. iii
  5. 2010
  6. Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge
  7. Mathematics course of the University of Cambridge
  8. Course of the University of Cambridge
  9. University of Cambridge
  10. List of universities
  11.  Home

 View article source

 Discussion (0)

New discussion

There are no discussions about this article yet.

 Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.
  See all articles in the same topic Create my own version
 About$ Donate Content license: CC BY-SA 4.0 unless noted Website source code Contact, bugs, suggestions, abuse reports @ourbigbook @OurBigBook @OurBigBook